How We Slept Through the Climate Alarm

Until the end of the 20th Century, most scientistsoceans, land masses and atmosphere.
thought they understood the nature of ourHowever, with their old ideas now challenged by
climate system. As the very foundation of theirthese new theories, scientists began to notice the
science, geologists cherished the "uniformitarianevidence of abrupt changes in their data. Pollen
principle" that held that the fundamental forcesrecords and improved carbon dating techniques in
that molded the Earth's features and climate werethe 1970's depicted stable climate periods
gradual, natural, stable processes that did notinterrupted by radical discontinuities that took only
vary over time scales less than tens of thousandsone or two centuries to totally change the
of years.vegetation of a region.
This idea became central to their training throughSince then, evidence from other studies such as
a century of debate over natural catastrophescores of glacial ice and ocean sediments, has
such as the biblical account of Noah's flood. Thecontinued to accumulate as methodologies have
concept of catastrophic climate change becamebeen progressively refined. This has further built
'tainted by association' with creationist zealotsjustification for heroic research, by intrepid teams
seeking scientific backing for fundamentalistbraving hazardous conditions on heaving oceans or
interpretations of Bible passages. And so, suchbitter, high altitude polar ice sheets, to win
stories came to be considered as purelysamples deep and distinct enough to provide an
supernatural events, with no place within theunambiguous picture of the Earth's geological and
objectivity of science.climatic past, a picture that shows that violent,
Any evidence to the contrary...and there was, inspectacular short-term shifts were common.
retrospect, plenty of it... was at first readilyAs a result, scientists en masse were beginning to
dismissed. Sudden climate change in the Earth'sentertain the possibility of abrupt change, this new
past was blurred by imperfect data and lack ofattitude reflected in a statement from the
refinement in early scientific methods. WhereIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in a
abrupt changes in the geological record were1996 report that concluded that 'climate surprises'
indisputable, these were written off as regionalwere possible. The point was not emphasized at
curiosities, arising from purely local impacts - suchthe time, and received little press attention. Many
as a forest fire or the introduction of agriculture -scientists also passively rejected the facts by
impacts that had nothing to do with climate.refusing to revise their accustomed ways of
Until dating methods were perfected, chronologicalthinking about climate.
correlation of data collected at different locationsNot until 2000 did paired ice-cores, extracted by
around the globe was not possible, and evencompeting teams in Greenland, match to show
when it was possible, was not at first evenirrevocable proof of abrupt climate shifts taking
pursued. Global changes in climate had differenteffect over mere decades (see R.B. Alley's book
effects in different areas, further complicating the'The Two-Mile Time Machine'). Similar cores were
issue and obscuring the true scope of abrupt,drilled in Antarctica and revealed the global scale
world-wide climate shifts.of the shifts. This forced the climate community
In fact, the uniformitarian climate paradigm wasto arrive at consensus.
scarcely doubted until the 1950's when a group ofNow respected climate scientists concur that the
scientists set up a physical ocean system modelpotential for fast climate change evidently does
that demonstrated that circulation could flip rapidlyexist, and could surprise humanity with a climate
from one stable state to another. Scientists beganshock within the lifetimes of you and I. However,
to concede that change may only take thousandsthe new paradigm has not extended beyond
of years.geoscientists to the impacts community -
This view of the change-rate capacity of climateeconomists and other specialists are slow to turn
was reduced to mere hundreds of years intheir attention to the consequences of climate
subsequent decades, beginning in the early 1960'schange, and policy makers and the public are even
when mathematical models that incorporatedmore ignorant of the risks humanity faces.
climate feedback factors such as snow and iceBecause science has been late to wake up to
cover (albedo effects) suggested that globalclimate change, crucial information about the
climate really could change enormously in apotential behavior of our climate has only very
relatively short time.recently come to light. Relentlessly emerging
In the mid 1960's deep sea sediment cores finallyclimate surprises have thrown into painful relief
revealed that the planet had experienced severaljust how inadequate our understanding of the
ice-age cycles of gradual glacial buildups overclimate system remains. Like a snowball rolling
90,000 year intervals, punctuated by more rapiddown a mountain, climate change is gathering
10,000 year de-glaciations. Because of the hugemomentum, racing ahead of even the most
lag between global climate shifts and deep seapessimistic predictions.
temperature responses, even this data belied theWill you be ready?
extreme magnitude of changes on the surface