Toxic Gas Lawsuits against Environmental Protection Agency

Within the past couple years, several states andcontrol of the EPA as outlined in the Clean Air Act.
organizations have filed toxic gas lawsuits againstThe section of the Clean Air Act under debate
the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).was the wording that it is the responsibility of the
The central argument centers on theEPA administrator to set emission standards for
interpretation of the 1970 Clean Air Act, how to"any air pollutant" from motor vehicles which in his
define and regulate "air pollutants", and if it is theher judgment contributes to air pollution and
responsibility of the EPA to do so.affects public health/welfare.
The first of these lawsuits was filed back in 2005The Administrations approach for emissions was
in the D.C District Court of Appeals by groupsthe same as with the concentrated animal feeding
such as the Sierra Club and the Environmentaloperations: do nothing and let the major auto
Integrity Project. The toxic gases under questioncompanies work amongst themselves to find a
in this lawsuit were the harmful pollutants emittedsolution to the carbon dioxide problem. The EPA
from concentrated animal feeding operationsadministrator also debated whether man made
which include ammonia gas, hydrogen sulfide, andcarbon dioxide emissions was the real cause of
fine dust particles. The plaintiffs argue that theseglobal warming, despite existing scientific evidence
feeding operations are not like traditional familywhich already supports this theory. This lawsuit
farms of the past, but are instead very largewas debated by lower courts trying to decide if
corporate run operations which pack largethe plaintiffs had legal standing, and although the
numbers of animals into very small spaces.District of Columbia Circuit Court ruled in favor of
The result is the emission of these toxic gases inthe EPA the case was eventually brought before
large quantities into the environment on a yearlythe Supreme Court. According to the Supreme
basis which have all been linked to causingCourt ruling it was decided that the plaintiffs had a
respiratory illness. In its defense, the EPA claimsvalid case, and that under the Clean Air Act
that it is working with the Bush Administration ascarbon dioxide was an air pollutant of public health
part of the sweetheart deal to monitor theconcern.
progress of these concentrated animal feedingThe EPA is now obligated to begin limiting tailpipe
operations to clean up their acts on their ownemissions beginning with the 2009 model year.
over a number of years.Part of this process will be reducing the escape of
This wait and see approach is what led to thetoxic gases from fuel cans by creating a tighter
next set of toxic gas lawsuits filed against theseal on the lids. Automakers will also be restricted
EPA, although this time the issue was emissionsto the amount of benzene added to gasoline to
gas and global warming. This most recent lawsuitensure proper engine combustion. Benzene is a
was filed towards the end of 2006 and namescarcinogen linked to anemia and reduced blood cell
California, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Illinois,counts, and the new measures taking place by
Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut,2011 ensure that automakers are taking positive
New Jersey, New York, Washington, Vermont,steps to make their vehicles more
and Oregon, as well as Baltimore, the District ofenvironmentally friendly.
Columbia, and the Sierra Club as plaintiffs.It is expected to take until 2030 for full
The argument is whether or not carbon dioxide iscompliance on the new measures to take effect,
considered an air pollutant leading to globalbut the EPA feels that these stricter standards
warming, and if the EPA should be doing more towill lead to billions of dollars in health care savings
regulate carbon dioxide emissions. The plaintiff'sand reduced toxic gas emissions by over 300,000
case is that carbon dioxide must be considered antons.
air pollutant since it has been scientifically provenRocco Beatrice, CPA, MST, MBA, Award-winning
to be the principal greenhouse gas affecting globaltrust & estate-planning expert. 71 Commercial
warming. They feel that this definition of carbonStreet #150 Boston, MA 02109 toll-free:
dioxide as a threat to public safety puts it within888-938-5872
the jurisdiction of the EPA under the Clean AirWatch a FREE video & learn how you can reduce
Act and they have a responsibility to regulate ityour taxes, protect your assets & secure your
via cleaner burning cars.privacy. Free consultation. No Obligation, no risk,
The Bush Administration and the EPA tried tono sales pressure.
argue that carbon emissions were beyond the