A National Recycling Standard

I recycle, at least, I try to. Lifelong dedication tonor is that necessarily a good idea, but what
the environment, and I still wonder whether thatabout some standards? Is there anything else the
envelope I'm holding is accepted in our paperfederal government has a hand in regulating by
recycling program. Are the plastic windowed onesallowing its operation by the private sector? Bingo,
allowed? If so, does the window have to beorganic foods. Currently, the USDA provides
under a certain size? What about shiny paper?standards for independent certifying bodies to
Usually it is excluded, however, junk mail isinspect operations for compliance. If approved,
specifically mentioned as accepted. Of course,they are permitted to use the USDA Organic seal
that doesn't cover the plastics. Bypassing theon their product, providing standardization and
issue of the numbers, a separate discussionease-of-use for consumers.
altogether, take the example of plastic shoppingI propose a similar system for recycling. Instead
bags. These items must be deposited elsewhereof the current labyrinth of policies, simply have a
for recycling (the thin bags get trapped in theuniversally-recognizable logo printed on all products
machinery and clog it), even though they aremeeting the federal government's recycling
tagged with otherwise-included numbers. Did Istandard. The EPA (presumably the lead agency
mention that if otherwise excluded items wind upon the issue) will then go about assisting and
in the recycling pile, the entire batch is consideredapproving existing waste disposal/recycling
contaminated and subsequently thrown away? Nocompanies. Upon certification, they will be capable
pressure. Move to another city and the acceptedof processing a given criteria of materials, for
items are likely completely different. With such aexample, plastics coded 1-6, clear and green glass,
convoluted system, what hope does the averagealuminum, and specific forms of paper, for all of
person trying to do their part have?their existing customers. The difference now is
Recent news reports claim that the incomingthat on the disposal end, we do away with the
Obama administration will be appointing formertraditional recycling logo and affiliated marks, and
EPA administrator Carol Browner as energy "czar"replace them with a custom EPA Recycle logo, in
to "coordinate energy issues across the federalthe same vein as the USDA Organic logo. For
government" . An entirely new position in thecitizens living/working within a service area of an
United States, surely her responsibilities will solidifyEPA-approved waste disposal company, they can
as she grows into her role. Coordination is arest assured that if they place an EPA Recycle
wonderful idea; by keeping a unified focus in alllabelled product in their recycle bin, it will be
federal activities, real progress can be made inproperly recycled. Market forces will push waste
energy policy. Energy, however, is not nearly asoperators to achieve the EPA distinction to
closed a field as implied. To make substantiveaccommodate the demands of their clientele, as
impact on the global environment, they will needwell as product manufacturers adopting its use on
to focus on all aspects of energy use, andappropriate products.
guarantee that we are using our energy efficientlySuch a system eliminates the consideration of
and intelligently.plastic code numbers (many people don't even
This is where the stories converge.know they exist), cardboard versus paperboard
Recycling, at its very core, is intended to reducerecycling, or any number of other issues that can
the need to expend resources in makingand do arise daily. Reference the success of the
something new when an already-producedUSDA Organic seal. Average citizens regularly
equivalent exists. If one were to ask a personseek out organic options, a change partially
why they might use recycled paper, a logicalbrought about simply by the addition of a
answer may include the following: "So we don'tstandardized logo.
have to cut down more trees". The same goesWe have a golden opportunity ahead of us as we
for bottled water or a can of soda - why gowelcome a new administration strongly committed
through the effort of producing more virgin plasticto the environment. A national recycling standard
when a recycled bottle already sequestered thewill help bridge the gap between the U.S. and
necessary energy? In essence, recycling is theSwitzerland, the global leader, standing at 76% .
act of being more intelligent with our energy (andAs of 2007, the United States had a recycling
resource) use.rate of approximately 33%, a value needlessly
Suddenly, recycling sounds like a topic upon whichdiminished by confusion, contamination, and
the administration will wish to focus, but how togeneral ignorance of the current situation .
do so? Waste services are privately ownedAmericans want to recycle, but when presented
enterprises operating independently or on contractwith a hodgepodge of policies nationwide, it can
with municipalities, not the federal government. Itmake even the most green of people simply
is doubtful they would be open to nationalization,throw it away.