| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Introduction: | | | | personal interaction with the villages was collected. |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In the present | | | | The demands of the energy required for cooking/ |
| energy scenario most of the population lives in | | | | domestic sector was satisfied by using the |
| rural areas with short of electricity supply, which is | | | | pigeonpea, cotton and sunflower residues. A large |
| the main obstacle in the development of rural | | | | amount of residue were found surplus in the |
| areas. The increasing consumption of conventional | | | | villages. Cattle dung and cotton residues as a |
| fuels coupled with environmental degradation has | | | | biomass were found major surplus in the village. |
| led to the development of renewable energy | | | | Table 5 depict information of the yearly availability |
| sources. Hence, it is necessary to supply | | | | of agricultural residue, production, consumption and |
| renewable electricity to these areas in | | | | surplus in the village. It was found that 8671.5 q |
| decentralized mode. Renewable energy sources | | | | cattle dung and among agro residue 1197.5 q |
| are the most feasible solutions, as these are | | | | cotton residue were found surplus (Fig. 2). |
| unlimited, inexhaustible and environment friendly | | | | Table 5. Collection, consumption and surplus of |
| sustainable resources. The rural villages have | | | | energy in village |
| substantial renewable energy sources like biomass, | | | | Â |
| solar, wind etc. The problem caused by variable | | | | Biomass source |
| nature of these resources can be partially | | | | Collection (q) |
| overcome by either installing individual large | | | | Consumption (q) |
| renewable power plant or adding energy storage | | | | Surplus (q) |
| and reconversion facilities and / or by integration. | | | | Cattle dung |
| (Kanse Patil et al. 2008, Rajvanshi A.K. 2002, | | | | 11644.5 |
| Ravindranath N.H.et al. 2004,and Shukla P.R. 2008) | | | | 2973 |
| 1. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Assessment of | | | | 8671.5 |
| available bio resources is helpful in revealing its | | | | Cotton |
| status and helps in taking conservation measures | | | | 5531.8 |
| and ensures a sustained supply to meet the | | | | 4334.3 |
| energy demand. Assessment of bioenergy | | | | 1197.5 |
| potential can be theoretical, technical or economic. | | | | Soybean |
| Sukla (2008) reported that despite rapid growth | | | | 1139.6 |
| of commercial energy, biomass remains principle | | | | 1139.6 |
| energy source in rural and traditional sectors and | | | | 0 |
| contributes a third of India’s energy.    For | | | | Sorghum |
| Â development of rural area one of the solution | | | | 3827.1 |
| will be the utilization of sources, that lies within a | | | | 3827.1 |
| village itself that is non commercial energy | | | | 0 |
| sources. These sources can be harnessed | | | | Pigeonpea |
| efficiently by adopting gasifier, biogas plants, solar | | | | 503.5 |
| collectors, tree plantation etc. which will provide | | | | 426 |
| lightning for home and streets, fuel for cooking | | | | 77.5 |
| and water heating motive power, power for | | | | Maize |
| pumps for irrigation etc. for efficient utilization of | | | | 1899.2 |
| non commercial energy resources and exploitation | | | | 1899.2 |
| of new one for rural area proper planning is | | | | 0 |
| essential. ( Chauhan S. 2008, Chauhan S. et al. | | | | Gram |
| 2004, Ericsson et al. 2006, Esteban L.S. et al. | | | | 718.74 |
| 2008, Fischer G. et al. 2001 and Fuchs, M.R.et al. | | | | 718.74 |
| 2005 ) | | | | 0 |
| This work has emphases mainly on to find out | | | | Sunflower |
| the potential of agrowaste, livestock waste and | | | | 471.5 |
| biomass available in the village for energy | | | | 347 |
| generation. Keeping above views in mind the | | | | 124.5 |
| study was taken with objectives to assess | | | |  |
| bioresources potential of village 'Nimbhora' and | | | | Fig. 2: Collection, consumption and surplus of |
| suggest renewable energy planning for self | | | | energy in village |
| sufficient energy village. | | | | Â |
| MATERIALSÂ AND METHOD | | | | Consumption of bioresources and energy in village |
| Biomass resource assessment | | | | Detailed summary of energy consumption for |
| Field surveys based on household and direct | | | | various major activities (Biomass and allied |
| interview methods was carried out in the village | | | | energy) was carried out in this investigation. Table |
| to collect potential available of biomass. Biomass | | | | 6 reveals the information about the consumption |
| energy supply was based primarily on land use | | | | of electricity of households, processing mills, |
| statistics and yield of various crops, plantation and | | | | consumption through street lamps, school, gram |
| forest biomass productivities and the animal | | | | panchayat, temples, post office etc. There were |
| waste available. | | | | only three floor grinding mills available in the village. |
| Village information | | | | There were 170 households in the village. Since |
| The study was being conducted at Nimbhora in | | | | the soil of village Nimbhora comes under saline |
| Akola District of Maharashtra State. It is 20 km | | | | track, most of the farming was rainfed and there |
| away from Akola. The major crops grown in the | | | | was no irrigation facility. |
| village were cotton, sorghum, soybean, green | | | | Table 6 : Yearly consumption of electricity in the |
| gram, pigeonpea, gram etc. Total population of | | | | village Nimbhora |
| the village is 951 consisting of 170 households. The | | | | Â |
| detail information of each family was obtained by | | | | Household kWh (A) |
| personal interaction with the people. It was | | | | Agro processing mill kWh (B) |
| observed that total geographical area in | | | | School street lamp temple and various offices in |
| Nimobhora was 1443.38 acre and area under | | | | village (C) kWh |
| cultivation is 1352.8 acre. All the cultivable area | | | | Total A + B+ C (kWh) |
| was rainfed and there was no facility of irrigation | | | | Â |
| in the area. | | | | 85410 |
| Biomass from agricultural and residues | | | | Â |
| The cultivated area and the biomass yield of each | | | | 10585 |
| crop influence the biomass potential from | | | | Â |
| agricultural residues. The yield of a crop according | | | | 5372.8 |
| to season and variety across an area was | | | | Â |
| obtained by a averaging the yields of the previous | | | | 101367.8 |
| years. The energy equivalent of these residues | | | | Â |
| was taken based on what would be obtained if | | | | Â |
| they would be subjected to the most energy | | | | Â |
| efficient transformation processes. Portion of the | | | | Fig. 3 : Yearly consumption of electricity in the |
| residues available were used as fuel, while some | | | | village Nimbhora |
| used as fodder, and the rest left behind in the | | | | Â |
| field for nutrient recycling. Energy from agriculture | | | | Table 6 shows the outlook of electrical energy |
| residues (E1). | | | | consumption of various operational uses in the |
| E1 = Energy from agriculture residue (kcal) | | | | village. It was observed that yearly consumption |
| = Total agro residue production – consumption | | | | of electrical energy in village comes to be |
| of agro residue | | | | 101367.8 kWh (Fig. 3). |
| Â | | | | Nearly 7800 ? diesel was consumed annually for |
| Â | | | | the tractor operation and 4562 ? of petrol |
| Â | | | | required for vehicles available in the village. The |
| Â | | | | villagers used 10 motorcycles for conveyance. |
| Â | | | | Kerosene and LPG was used as a fuel for lighting |
| Â | | | | and cooking purpose in the village which is |
| Â | | | | depicted in Table 7. |
| Â | | | | Â |
| Table 1: Grain to straw ratio of various crops . | | | | Â |
| Â | | | | Â |
| Crop | | | | Table 7 : Yearly consumption of liquid fuel and LPG |
| Grain / Straw | | | | in Nimbhora |
| Cotton | | | | Â |
| 3 t/ha | | | | Parameter |
| Soybean | | | | Number |
| 1:1 | | | | Diesel ? |
| Jawar | | | | Petrol ? |
| 1:3 | | | | Kerosene ? |
| Pigeonpea | | | | LPG cylinders or refills |
| 1:4 | | | | Motor cycle |
| Gram | | | | 10 |
| 1:1.3 | | | | 4562 |
| Green gram | | | | Tractor |
| 1: 1.3 | | | | 3 |
| Maize | | | | 7800 |
| 1:4 | | | | Cooking and lighting |
| Sunflower | | | | 5352 |
| 1:2 | | | | Cooking |
| Source : Dubey et al. (2009) | | | | 187 |
| Heat value of various crops were taken in range | | | | Available energy from biomass |
| of 3000-3650 kcal/kg The heat value for cotton, | | | | The information about the quantity of biomass |
| pigeonpea and sunflower were taken as 3500, | | | | resources available in the village Nimbhora is given |
| 3000 and 3650 kcal/kg respectively. | | | | in Table 8 . Agricultural residue such as cotton, |
| Biomass from forest lands | | | | pigeonpea, soybean and cattle dung etc were also |
| The biomass potential of the forests is dependent | | | | the major available resources of biomass in the |
| on the type of forest and its distribution cover. | | | | village. For calculating energy generation capacity |
| The biomass production varies with the type of | | | | of biomass resources, calorific values of the |
| forest. The forest wood fuel collected annually by | | | | biomass were considered (Fig.4). Considering all |
| the household from the adjoining forest area was | | | | the available surplus quantity of biomass, total |
| taken with the energy equivalent. Total energy | | | | energy generation in the village was found to be |
| from forests (E2) was computed by | | | | 727539.82 kWh. |
| E2 =Energy from forests (kcal) | | | | Table 8 : Available bio energy from surplus |
| =Annual wood collected - Consumption of wood in | | | | biomass resources |
| household activates | | | | Â |
| Â | | | | Biomass source |
| Biomass from live stock (animals) | | | | Â |
| The livestock population of cattle, buffalo, sheep | | | | Quantity (q) |
| and goat was collected from the personal | | | | Total possible energy available, kcal |
| interaction with the respondents. It was taken as | | | | Energy generation kWh |
| 12-15 kg/animal/day for buffalo, 3.0-7.5 kg/animal | | | | Cotton |
| day for cattle, 0.1 kg/animal/day for sheep and | | | | 1197.5 |
| goat. The total dung produced annually was | | | | 419097000 |
| calculated by multiplication of the animal dung | | | | 487322 |
| production per year and the number of head of | | | | Pigeonpea |
| different animals. Assuming 0.036-0.042 m3 biogas | | | | 77.5 |
| yields per kg of cattle/buffalo dung, the total | | | | 23268000 |
| quantity of gas available was estimated. Total | | | | 27055.8 |
| energy from livestock (E3) was computed by | | | | Sunflower |
| E3 = Energy from livestock (kcal) | | | | 124.5 |
| = Total cow dung collected - direct dung | | | | 45442500 |
| consumption through cake | | | | 52840.11 |
| Â | | | | Dung |
| Â | | | | 8671.5 |
| Â | | | | 137876850 |
| Table 2 : Dung yield, biogas yield and energy | | | | 160321.91 |
| equivalent for livestock. | | | | Total possible energy generation kWh |
| Livestock type | | | | 727539.82 kWh |
| Case | | | | Â |
| Dung yield kg/animal/ day | | | | Â |
| Biogas yield m3 | | | | Â |
| Energy equivalent kcal/m3 | | | | Â |
| Buffalo | | | | Â |
| High | | | | Fig. 4: Available bio energy from surplus biomass |
| 15 | | | | resources |
| 0.042 | | | | Â |
| 5300 | | | | It realized that electrical energy consumption was |
| Low | | | | found less than the bioresources energy available |
| 10 | | | | in the village. The ratio of energy generation from |
| 0.036 | | | | bioresource to the energy consumption of the |
| 5300 | | | | village was around 7:1. |
| Cattle | | | | It means that the energy used by the villagers |
| High | | | | was found much less than the biomass generated |
| 7.5 | | | | in the village. It is also realized that gasification |
| 0.042 | | | | based electrical energy generation system and |
| 5300 | | | | biogas electrical energy generation project will be |
| Low | | | | possible alternative for generating electrical energy |
| 3 | | | | in the village. A proposed renewable energy |
| 0.036 | | | | system will not have any impact on the ecological |
| 5300 | | | | cycle of the village bioresources. |
| Goat | | | | Biomass gasifier and digester |
| High | | | | Power generation capacity from agro residues |
| 0.1 | | | | The planning of the suitable system for energy |
| 0.042 | | | | generation at village level was the first step. |
| 5300 | | | | Proper planning minimizes the cost of system and |
| Low | | | | the future cost of the energy generation. The |
| 0.1 | | | | surplus biomass availale in the village was cotton |
| 0.036 | | | | residue, pigeon pea residue sunflower residues and |
| 5300 | | | | cattle dung. The overall conversion efficiency of |
| Sheep | | | | producer gas based electrical energy production |
| High | | | | was reported 17%. The total installation capacity |
| 0.1 | | | | of power generation based on gasifier system |
| 0.042 | | | | was found to be 35 kW (Table 9). |
| 5300 | | | | Â |
| Low | | | | Â |
| 0.1 | | | | Table 9 : Possible energy generation with installed |
| 0.036 | | | | power capacity of gasifier. |
| 5300 | | | | Â |
| Total biomass sources available from various | | | | Energy from cotton, pigeon pea and sunflower |
| sectors was  computed by aggregating the | | | | residue kWh |
| energy computed from individual sectors | | | | Total installed capacity |
| (forestry, agriculture residues, livestock) and given | | | | 96427.00 |
| by | | | | 35 |
| Energy availability = ? (E1 + E2 + E3) | | | | Â |
| Energy utilization pattern of village | | | | Power generation capacity from cattle waste |
| In this study, the energy consumption patterns of | | | | The cattle dung was a main vital source for the |
| the village was studied from the survey. All socio | | | | bio power generation in the village. The total |
| economic activities related to the energy use was | | | | quantity of surplus cattle dung available in village |
| collected. The use of energy in houses, village | | | | was 8671.5 q per year. The overall conversion |
| lightning system, use of diesel in tractor allied | | | | efficiency of biogas based electrical energy |
| machineries, use of petrol for two wheeler and | | | | production was reported 25 % (Biogas to |
| small agro processing units was collected. | | | | electrical energy). Considering surplus cattle dung a |
| Energy Density of village | | | | 15 kW size of digester based power generator |
| The energy density of the village was calculated | | | | was estimated for village Nimbhora. |
| for knowing the energy potential available per | | | | Table 10 : Possible energy generation with installed |
| hectare. The total possible energy generation | | | | power capacity of digester. |
| from all the biomass sources was determined by | | | | Â |
| using the heat value of the biomass. This means | | | | Cattle dung surplus (q) |
| that the energy density is the total possible | | | | Energy (kWh) |
| energy available through biomass sources in a | | | | Total installed capacity kW |
| particular area. The computational formula for the | | | | Â |
| calculation of energy density was taken as | | | | 8671.5 |
| Â | | | | Â |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Total possible energy | | | | 40080.47 |
| generation (kWh) | | | | Â |
| ED = | | | | 15 |
| -------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | Â |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Total geographical area of | | | | Â |
| village (ha) | | | | Biomass   generation of village |
| Where, ED is energy density in kWh per hectare | | | | The sizes of the power generation have been |
| Biomass power generator size selection | | | | decided with the total energy generation in a year. |
| The sizes of the biomass power generator was | | | | The table 4.9 insight the overall picture of the |
| decided on the basis of the quantities of biomass | | | | energy generation. Considering the conversion |
| available and the overall conversion efficiency | | | | efficiency of the gasification and digester based |
| computed and decided by means of the following | | | | power generation system for the predicted green |
| formulae. | | | | energy in a year. The total energy generation |
| Â | | | | from the possible installed capacity of generator |
| Energy                    =     | | | | was found to be 136507.47 kWh. |
| Quantity of    x     Heating     | | | | Table 4.9 : Sizes of biomass power generator |
| x    Conversiongeneration | | | | with one year energy generation. |
| (kWh)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | Â |
| biomass               | | | | Gasifier kW |
| value                efficiency | | | | Digester kW |
| This relation mainly emphasized on the total | | | | Energy gasifier kWh |
| energy generation of the system. The size of | | | | Energy digester kWh |
| power generator (crop residue based) can be | | | | Total install power kW |
| calculated by using following relationship. | | | | Total energy kWh |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Energy | | | | Â |
| generation (kWh) | | | | 35 |
| Power generator size (kW) = | | | | Â |
| ---------------------------------------------- | | | | 15 |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Yearly | | | | Â |
| operating hours (h) | | | | 96427 |
| The sizes for the digester based power | | | | Â |
| generation was computed by using the following | | | | 40080.47 |
| relation: | | | | Â |
| Energy generation (kWh)= Biogas x heating | | | | 45 |
| value x conversion efficiency | | | | Â |
| The operating hours per day and thereby as | | | | 136507.47 |
| whole year for digester based power generation | | | | Â |
| system was decided for calculation. The size of | | | | Â |
| power generator of biogas operated was | | | | CONCLUSIONS |
| calculated by using following relationship. | | | | The study revealed that the village was having |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Energy | | | | considerable surplus of bioresources. Among the |
| generation (kWh) | | | | bioresources, cotton residue and cattle dung |
| Power generator size (kW) = | | | | contributed significantly toward surplus bioenergy. |
| ----------------------------------------- | | | | Based on the bioenergy status, feasible |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Yearly | | | | management and technical options was discussed |
| operating hours (h) | | | | which would helpful in optimizing the available |
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION | | | | bioenergy and in building a sustainable energy. The |
| Bioresources potential for village Nimbhora was | | | | proposed renewable energy system will minimize |
| assessed and on the basis of surplus availability | | | | the burden on the existing resources so as to |
| renewable energy planning for self sufficient | | | | become self sufficient energy village. In village |
| energy village was carried out and discussed in | | | | Nimbhora, bioenergy availability and demand of |
| this chapter. | | | | energy computation showed that the village could |
| Status of biomass sources in village | | | | be self sufficient in respect to energy. It was |
| The biomass potential, demand and energy use | | | | found that surplus cotton residue available with |
| pattern in the villages was calculated from the | | | | quantity 1197.5 q in one year and therefore, |
| available data. The bulk of dung was obtained in | | | | contributed the main bioresources in the village. A |
| the village from bullock, cow, buffalo and calf 189, | | | | large quantity of cattle dung was available in |
| 123, 25 and 113 in numbers respectively. | | | | village. The availability of the cattle dung was |
| It was observed that 11644.5 q dung was | | | | found to be 8671.5 q in a year By incorporating |
| available in village Nimbhora and among the | | | | the demand of the bioresources, it was also |
| agricultural waste cotton residues was major | | | | observed that bioresources produced in the village |
| source of biomass contributing about 5531.8 q | | | | is surplus.It was found that energy demand of the |
| (Table 3 and Fig.1). Pigeonpea and sunflower were | | | | village comes to be 101367.8 kWh. The surplus |
| also important biomass sources while planning the | | | | bioenergy resource of the village had a energy |
| self energy strategy of the respective village. | | | | generation capacity upto the 727539.82 kWh. The |
| Table 3 : Status of biomass in village Nimbhora | | | | ratio of bioresources availability to demand |
| Â | | | | represent the bioresources status and it was |
| Sr. No. | | | | found 7:1. It clearly indicates that bioresources in |
| Biomass source | | | | the village was surplus. It was realized that, |
| Â | | | | renewable energy generation system, based on |
| Total quantity (q) | | | | gasification and biogas suited to the village |
| 1 | | | | bioresources which have no ecological impact on |
| Dung | | | | cycle of bioresources. The total power generator |
| 11644.5 | | | | size of proposed renewable energy system was |
| 2 | | | | found to be 50 kW for village Nimbhora. |
| Cotton | | | | Â |
| 5531.8 | | | | References: |
| 3 | | | | [1] Chauhan S. (2008) Assessment of sustainable |
| Pigeonpea | | | | surplus biomass resources for power generation |
| 503.56 | | | | potential in the state of Haryana, India. Journal of |
| 4 | | | | Energy Innovation and Entrepreneurship (5): 28-43. |
| Sorghum | | | | [2] Chauhan S. and Sbri C.S. (2004) Assessment |
| 3827.1 | | | | of biomass availability for power generation in |
| 5 | | | | selected talukas of Utteranchal state. ENVIS |
| Green gram | | | | Bulletin: 1-6. |
| 339 | | | | [3] Dubey A. and Gangil S. (2009) Status of |
| 6 | | | | availability of surplus biomass power generation. |
| Sunflower | | | | Advance in biomass utilization for electricity |
| 471.5 | | | | generation, CIAE Bhopal page. 25. |
| 7 | | | | [4] Ericsson . and Nilson L.J. (2006) Assessment of |
| Gram | | | | the potential biomass supply in Europe using a |
| 718.7 | | | | resource focused approach. Biomass and |
| 8 | | | | bioenergy, Vol 30 : 1-15. |
| Soybean | | | | [5] Esteban L.S., Ciria P. and Corrasco J.E., (2008) |
| 1139.62 | | | | An assessment of relevant methodological |
| 9 | | | | elements and criteria for surveying sustainable |
| Maize | | | | agricultural and forestry biomass by product for |
| 1899 | | | | energy purposes: Surveying sustainable biomas, |
| Â | | | | Bioresources 3 (3): pp. 910-928. |
| Â | | | | [6]Â Fischer G. and Schrattenholzer L. (2001) |
| Fig. 1 : Status of biomass in village Nimbhora | | | | Global bioenergy potentials through 2050. Biomass |
| Livestock bio energy sources | | | | and bioenergy 20 (3): 151-159. |
| In this study, information about all the bioenergy | | | | [7] Fuchs, M.R. and Frear, C. (2005) Biomass |
| resources was collected and presented in table 4 | | | | invenstory and bioenergy assessment: an |
| reveals the information about the production and | | | | evaluation of organic material resources for |
| use of the animal dung in the village. It was found | | | | bioenergy production in Washington State. |
| that 11644.5 q of cattle dung was available in one | | | | Available at |
| year with a consumption of 2973 q and surplus | | | | [8]Â Kanase Patil A.B., Saini R.P. and Sharma M.P. |
| available 8670 q, which help to fulfill the demand | | | | (2008) Integrated Renewable energy system for |
| of villages by using the suitable renewable energy | | | | off grid electrification of remote rural area: |
| conversion system. | | | | Renewable energy and environment for |
| Table 4: Use and surplus of the cattle dung in the | | | | sustainable Development, Page 169. |
| village | | | | [9] Rajvanshi A.K. (2002) Talukas can Provide |
|  | | | | Critical Mass for India’s Sustainable |
| No. of animals | | | | Development. Current Science Vol. 82 No. 6, Page |
| Dung available (q) | | | | 632-637. |
| Total consumption (q) | | | | [10] Ramachandra T.V., Kamakshi G. and Shruti |
| Surplus (q) | | | | B.V. (2004)Â Bioresearch status in Karnataka. |
| 526 | | | | Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 8 (1): |
| 11644.5 | | | | 1-47. |
| 2973 | | | | [11] Ravindranath N.H., Somashekar H.F., Dasappa |
| 8671.5 | | | | S. and C.N. Jayasheela Reddy (2004) Sustainable |
| Â | | | | biomass power for rural India: case study of |
| Collection and surplus of bio resources in village | | | | biomass gasifier for village electrification. Current |
| In the selected village all biomass sources were | | | | Science Vol. 87 No. 7, Page 932. |
| collected for the determination of the biomass | | | | [12] Shukla P.R. (2008) Biomass energy in India: |
| generation capacity. Simultaneously the | | | | Policies and prospects. E2 Analytics energy + |
| consumption of the bio resources from the | | | | environment. Available at : com. |