Can We Afford a Climate Change Research Data Scandal?

The ruckus over the alleged editing of the climateemissions are contributing to global warming, but
warming data at the University of East Anglia inthe significance of that contribution is, for me, still
the UK is another episode in the continuing sagaopen to question.
of academic dishonesty that has beset scientificThe specific data which has been challenged
research so publicly in the last decade. We haverelates to atmospheric temperature records. Just
seen cases of fixed clinical trials of drugs,recently, we have heard that the last decade has
manipulation of data and false reporting in thebeen the warmest since records began 150 years
MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, rubella tripleago. Well, current understanding is that the earth
vaccine) scandal (which led to the striking-off of ais some 4,500 million years old, so a time span of
doctor in England) and numerous other examples150 years is relatively speaking, not even a gnat's
of scientific fraud.whisker.
It is by no means a new phenomenon - cases goI appreciate that the climate may well be
back many years. Piltdown Man, for example, waswarming, and that there are significant dangers to
a notorious tale of scientific duplicity. Thiscountries and to human population in countries
originated in 1912 and was not exposed as asuch as Bangladesh and the Maldive Islands, and
forgery until 1953. A skull reportedly discovered ineven the East Coast of England. It does concern
1912 in a gravel pit was purported at the time tome though that we may well be misusing our
be evidential of the 'missing link' between Man andresources in bringing industry and society into line
Apes. Whilst some people might have builton carbon emissions, when those resources could
reputations and careers based on the discovery,better be used in building defences (in the
there was arguably little real harm done by thebroadest possible sense) against planetary climate
forgery.change which may well be outside human cause
However, in the case of the MMR scandal, someor control.
children may have suffered as a result of notIn the case of Piltdown Man, for example, there
being appropriately vaccinated on the basis of thewere several eminent detractors from the
evidence presented by the researcher - at thehypothesis of the missing link, but their voices
time it caused a lot of worry for many parentswere drowned in the groundswell of excitement
who avoided the triple vaccine for their childrensurrounding the topic. I do hope that the same is
because of the alleged link (proven to benot happening over climate change, with dissenting
completely false) with autism.voices being silenced and the whole peer-review
Now, on a massive scale, we have the potentialprocess under a cloud. Additionally, the reported
for a similar scandal. With more than 170 nationsinability of climate-change dissenters to get
attending the International Climate Changepublished in the leading scientific journals is a cause
Conference in Copenhagen there is a hugefor serious concern. Rigorous research and robust,
bandwagon in motion and vested interests (onhonest peer-review are essential components in
both sides of the argument) almost on athe progress of science (and mankind) - without
planetary scale.them we are really in trouble.
For me, the case for man-made global warming isWe need solid, objective research, and quickly, to
not yet proven (I do have some background indetermine the scientific significance of man-made
physics and oceanography). Certainly, there iscarbon emissions in relation to the natural
evidence to suggest that industrial and societalbackground climate change.