Carbon Credits - Friend Or Foe?

Climate change is an environmental issue that hasIn some countries, cap-and-trade systems
become a global concern affecting all nations. Topatterned after the Kyoto Protocol are being
this end, countries worldwide are takingemployed alongside policies that aim to reduce
collaborative measures to mitigate the problem.greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the
For example, the Kyoto Protocol, which has beenUnited States has several carbon measures in
ratified by more than 100 countries (read: aplace, such as the Regional Greenhouse Gas
dramatically lower number are formally bound)Initiative (RGGI), the Western Climate Initiative
includes many regulations and initiatives whose(WCI), the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), and
objectives are to help reduce greenhouse gasan initiative provided for by the Global Warming
emissions. One popular initiative that the KyotoSolutions Act of 2006 in California.
supports is carbon credits, also known as carbonProponent Viewpoint
offsets (which is actually a form of regulatory taxProponents point out that the world at large has
since someone has to pay a carbon tax toto start somewhere to arrive at a system that
provide the credit part of the carbon creditbegins to reduce greenhouse emissions. They
system.)argue that carbon credits offer the best
Carbon credits are measured per metric ton ofintermediary solution until that time comes when a
carbon dioxide emissions or its equivalent in othermore definitive and viable system is put in place.
greenhouse gases. Typically, a government or anThey also praise the carbon credit process
international body establishes a system that setsbecause it is governed by a global marketplace,
a limit, known as a cap, on the total amount ofas opposed to other more bureaucratic and
emissions from all participating countries.self-serving schemes. Advocates say reducing
Participants are given equal allowances, or credits,greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate
based on the cap system. (There is a problemchange should be a collective effort. Governments
determining carbon caps because there is minimalhave responded by making carbon credit trading a
agreement and integration among groups andmore lucrative way of enticing industries to do
regulatory bodies about implementation timetheir share in solving a global problem.
frames and use of tax proceeds that creatingOpponent Viewpoint
carbon credits. This issue goes beyond the scopeParties opposed to the carbon credit system
of this article.)argue that it is a counterproductive measure that
Participants (generally read Companies) are thenunfairly penalizes consumers and businesses
organized into groups. If participants need tocompared to using tax incentives or tax credits.
exceed the cap, they have to buy carbon creditsOpponents also argue that a cap-and-trade
from other groups who have unused credits, at asystem is another way for politicians and their
value set by the market. Simply put, carbongovernments to get more money for causes
emissions are treated as commodities that can betheir lobbyists prefer and not necessarily do what
traded between participants, while the totalis best for the country as a whole. They argue
number of credits being traded in the marketthat alternative energy sources should be
must not exceed the total cap.subsidized until technology and scale of application
Reward-Penalty Systemresults in lower prices that makes renewable
The overall objective of carbon credits trading isenergy affordable. They believe that
to encourage companies to reduce theirgovernments are exploiting the situation and plan
greenhouse gas emissions. Those that do notto raise taxes for non energy purposes.
exceed their cap may sell their unused credits inMost countries agree that there are
the market or directly to other companies thatenvironmental and health benefits to be gained in
have to exceed their cap. This implies that thosemoving toward a greener business environment.
that do not exceed their cap are rewarded byGiven this position, the conversion to some
being able to sell their credits; while those that arerenewable energy policy is probably inevitable. The
not able to control their emissions are penalizedoverwhelming concern, however, has to do with
and have to pay the price.how these policies will be executed. The timing
The Kyoto Protocol has created a system ofand total costs (direct and indirect) of the
trading caps among its signatory countries (a totalchanges are not clear. At the root of this concern
of 181 countries, which include Russia, France,is the uncertainty about which groups will benefit
Germany, Canada, Norway, United Kingdom, India,and which groups will suffer. But one thing is
to name just a few). Basically, the cap requirescertain: With congressional leadership favoring the
countries to reduce their emissions 5.2% belowacceleration of greener energy in a way that
their 1990 baseline over the 2008 to 2012 period.benefits their constituents and lobbyists, there will
The total amount of carbon credits to bedefinitely be winners and losers.
allocated among countries is determined by theWhat the carbon credit discussion points to is the
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Jointurgency for business to begin planning NOW for
Implementation (JI) projects, which allow for thethe inevitability of a greener world. Those
creation of credits through emission-reductionbusinesses that prepare for it will prosper; those
projects.that do not will suffer the consequences.