Doomsday Stories

The human race is heading for ecological disasteratmosphere. After correcting for the "urban"
because of its increasing and all-pervasive assaultseffect, a study by the National Oceanographic and
on our air, water, and land. Pollution is everywhere.Atmospheric Administration concluded that there
Our industrial civilization is heading towardwas no statistically significant evidence of warming
environmental collapse, and mankind's fate hangsin the United States [italics added]. Andrew R.
in the balance.Solow, a statistician at Woods Hole, pointed out
Does this scare you out of your wits? It'sthat because monitoring stations tend to be
intended to do just that. This scenario from alocated on land rather than oceans and more are
second-rate horror movie is passed off asin the Northern than in the Southern Hemisphere,
scientific fact by a new breed of doomsdaytemperature readouts are not really global at all.
prophet, the radical environmentalist. Read andTen years of weather satellite data have also
take heed--the end is near. Here is an example ofshown no evidence of global warming."
a typical environmentalist scare story:There's little valid evidence of global warming.
"The present course of environmentalInstead, there's solid evidence that the Earth has
degradation, if unchecked, threatens the survivalnot been warming. Since 1978, a
of civilized man. Yet the evidence is overwhelmingtemperature-measuring satellite called Tiros II has
that the way in which we now live on the earth isbeen orbiting the Earth 24-hours a day. Guess
driving its thin, life-supporting skin, and ourselveswhat? The satellite's measurements showed no
with it, to destruction."significant increase or decrease in the Earth's
Environmentalists' doomsday predictions would betemperature. Scientific temperature
comical, if it wasn't for the fact that these scaremeasurements from Tiros II show no global
stories have frightened local, state, and federalwarming trend in the last fifteen years. In other
legislators into creating a massive, poisonous layerwords, global warming is a myth.
of regulations. Environmental regulations violate ourMany eminent scientists agree that global warming
property rights, restrict our personal liberties,and other environmental scare stories are just
threaten our standard of living, and throwunproven theories. Prior to the Earth Summit
thousands of Americans out of work.meeting in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992, scientists
Environmentalists concoct end-of-the-worldfrom around the world issued the Heidelberg
scenarios all the time. These predictions areAppeal. In the Appeal, scientists asked
calculated to scare us, and usually turn out to begovernment leaders at the summit to be careful.
pure fantasy, exaggerations, or deliberateThey asked the leaders not to make serious
distortions of the facts.environmental decisions based on pseudoscientific
The mother of all doomsday stories, of course, isarguments or false and non-relevant data. More
global warming. For over thirty years,than 250 scientists, including 27 Nobel prize
environmentalists have scared us with this one. Itwinners, issued the Appeal on June 1, 1992.
seems that car exhausts, forest clearing, powerToday, 2,300 scientists from 79 countries,
plants, and other industrial activities increaseincluding 65 Nobel prize winners, have signed the
carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. IncreasedAppeal.
carbon dioxide will allegedly create a barrier in theFormer governor of Washington state and
atmosphere that traps the Earth's heat, creating aformer chairwoman of the Atomic Energy
"greenhouse effect" As a result, the Earth'sCommission, Dr. Dixy Lee Ray, also thought that
temperature will rise, causing glaciers to melt, seasglobal warming is nonsense. In her wonderful 1993
to rise, worldwide flooding, and calamity to thebook, "Environmental Overkill: Whatever Happened
human race.To Common Sense?," she said that it was unlikely
As expected, there are many reputable scientiststhat carbon dioxide would cause any significant
who think this theory is nonsense. Other scientistschanges in worldwide temperatures. Jeffrey
have their own theories that totally contradictSalmon is executive director of the
global warming.Washington-based George C. Marshall Institute. In
"Kenneth E.F. Watt, professor of environmentalthe July 1993 issue of Commentary, he flatly
studies at the University of California at Davis,stated that he found no valid scientific evidence
theorized that an excess of carbon dioxide in theto prove that manmade gases are causing the
atmosphere should lead to global cooling, notEarth to warm from a greenhouse effect.
warming. Watt argued that carbon dioxide willIn short, we are being conned. Government takes
heat tropical oceans, leading to additionalbillions of tax dollars out of our pocket to enforce
evaporation. This will produce denser and moremassive environmental regulations that, in most
widespread clouds at high elevations, which willcases, protect you from nothing.
decrease the amount of sunlight that penetratesI could describe many other eco-scare stories, but
the atmosphere. Some scientists believe that theI think I've made my point. These doomsday
Earth is warming, but attribute the change toprophesies are either distortions or exaggerations
causes other than carbon dioxide production.of unproven facts. Unfortunately, radical
Frederick Seitz, past president of the Nationalenvironmentalists and the liberal media spout this
Academy of Sciences, suggested that solareco-nonsense so often that we start to believe
activity may have caused global warming, andthem. That's the problem and the danger.
Reid Bryson, director of the Institute ofPanicked, gullible Congressmen believe the scare
Environmental Studies at the University ofstories and then pass environmental regulations
Wisconsin, Madison, believes that dust and smokethat strangle our economy and destroy our
are the primary causes of climate change."property rights.
There are also many scientists who questionIt is time that we see these environmental scare
whether the Earth has gotten warmer over thestories for what they are -- a tactic by
last hundred years.left-leaning environmental radicals to destroy the
"Temperature measurements may be biased bything they hate most. What they hate most is
the effects of urbanization; weather stations areour liberty, property rights, and the free-market
located in urban areas, where heat-absorbingthat can make life for human beings on this planet
buildings and pavement can raise the readings onea joy instead of a brutal struggle for existence.
to two degrees above the surrounding