Energy Independence and Small Business

"Energy Independence" is an idea that's beengreen, efficient economy and create as many as
kicked around for a long time. Back in 1973 duringfive million new jobs. Sounds great! How will she
the Arab Oil Embargo that sent prices rising, gasdo it? Here is the outline:
lines lengthening and speed limits dropping, Richard- A new cap-and-trade program that auctions
Nixon first brought up the idea of an energy100% of permits alongside investments to move
independent America. It seemed to make senseus on the path towards energy independence;
at the time. The Arab world was punishing us for- An aggressive comprehensive energy efficiency
their losses during the Yom Kippur War withagenda to reduce electricity consumption 20%
Israel. Curtailing their control over our energyfrom projected levels by 2020 by changing the
production was logical. After all, we wereway utilities do business, catalyzing a green building
importing nearly 35% of our oil from the Middleindustry, enacting strict appliance efficiency
East.standards, and phasing out incandescent light
Since then, every president has paid lip service tobulbs;
the concept of energy independence but have- A $50 billion Strategic Energy Fund, paid for in
you noticed that it hasn't gotten any better? Inpart by oil companies, to fund investments in
fact, since Nixon's first, tentative words on thealternative energy. The SEF will finance one-third
subject, we have increased our dependence onof the $150 billon ten-year investment in a new
foreign oil. We now import over 60% of our oilenergy future contained in this plan;
each year and pump prices go up far more than- Doubling of federal investment in basic energy
they go down. In other words, we have had anresearch, including funding for an ARPA-E, a new
"energy crisis" of one sort or another for 35research agency modeled on the successful
years and for reasons of diplomacy,Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency;
environmentalism, real politic, industrial- Aggressive action to transition our economy
intransigence, consumer inertia and who knowstoward renewable energy sources, with
what else, very little has been done to solve therenewables generating 25% of electricity by 2025
problem.and with 60 billion gallons of home-grown biofuels
True, alternative fuels like ethanol seem promising,available for cars and trucks by 2030;
and we are doing better at harnessing wind and- 10 "Smart Grid City" partnerships to prove the
solar power. Hybrid, electrical, fuel cell and biodieseladvanced capabilities of smart grid and other
vehicles are slowly making their way into theadvanced demand-reduction technologies, as well
marketplace while the President has started anas new investment in plug-in hybrid vehicle
initiative to increase CAFÉ standards bytechnologies;
20 miles per gallon within the next 10 years. We- An increase in fuel efficiency standards to 55
are doing better at recycling and using energympg by 2030, and $20 billion of "Green Vehicle
efficient devices. All of that is great but most ofBonds" to help U.S. automakers retool their plants
these efforts depend on emerging technology andto meet the standards;
none of it deals with the problem that exists right- A plan to catalyze a thriving green building
now: Energy prices are out of control and theindustry by investing in green collar jobs and
most vulnerable sector of the economy, thehelping to modernize and retrofit 20 million
sector most likely to be harmed by this, is smalllow-income homes to make them more energy
business.efficient;
In 2006, back in the good old days of $76 per- A new "Connie Mae" program to make it easier
barrel oil prices, the Small Business Committee offor low and middle-income Americans to buy
the U.S. House of Representatives issued a reportgreen homes and invest in green home
called Impact of Rising Energy Costs on Smallimprovements;
Business. It is an interesting read for any small- A requirement that all publicly traded companies
businessman. The conclusions of that report arereport financial risks due to climate change in
as follows:annual reports filed with the Securities and
The impacts from the perceived and actual statusExchange Commission; and
of our energy supplies are significant.Last month- Creation of a "National Energy Council" within the
[July, 2006], the Federal Reserve ChairmanWhite House to ensure implementation of the plan
projected that higher energy rates will createacross the Executive Branch;
some inflation in the economy. He cited the- A requirement that all federal buildings designed
cumulative impacts of escalating energy prices asafter January 20, 2009 will be zero emissions
causing consumers and businesses to spend less,buildings.
and to pass on costs to others. U.S. industries areOK, more new technology and an emphasis on
also showing signs of deflation due to energyenvironment over economics. Again, there is
problems. Last month, the manufacturing sectornothing wrong with any of these per se, high
growth index was the lowest since the previousmileage standards and renewable resources are
August. Industry officials attributed energy costs,great, but does anything on this list address the
along with other inflationary impacts, such asissues at hand? Do they take advantage of
interest rate increases, as impediments toexisting technologies to deal with the core issues
expansion.facing America as its energy bills mount up? Will
Given the impacts from the energy crisis, includingthey lower the exorbitant pump prices that we
inflation and slowed economic growth, these firmsare all paying today? No, they won't. Perhaps we
- in an attempt to cover rising production costs -need to cross the aisle and see what the other
have constricted operations while limiting theirend of the American political spectrum can offer.
investment and expansion plans. Facing anJohn McCain has net yet offered a
increasingly unequal playing field, the extremecomprehensive energy plan. However, his
volatility of energy prices only creates largerspeeches, statements and proposals do offer
financial burdens and operational disruptions forsome insight into the Senator's point of view on
small firms when compared to their corporateenergy and the environment. Some of the things
counterparts.he has mentioned include:
The current energy crisis is just one more in a- A cap-and-trade system to cut carbon dioxide
series of challenges that have recently befallenemissions 30% below 2004 levels by 2050;
small businesses. These firms already face rising- The construction of new nuclear power plants
costs from many aspects of their enterprises,and economic incentives for communities that
particularly health care, pensions, and regulatoryhost nuclear waste repositories;
requirements - all which deplete key resources- Research and development of new energy
from their operations. On top of these demands,technologies;
energy affects entrepreneur's human, capital, and- Work with China to share clean coal technology;
raw materials. If these conditions continue, the- The development of ways to break down
economic climate will become increasingly harshcarbon dioxide into useful components;
for this country's small businesses and- New fossil fuel exploration and extraction;
entrepreneurs. (Impact of Rising Energy Costs on- The development of plug-in and
Small Business, House Small Business Committee,battery-powered electric, hybrid fuel-electric and
U.S. House of Representatives, August 2006)hydrogen fuel cell vehicles;
Does any of this sound familiar to anyone? It- Support for alternative fuels, like ethanol from
should, given the facts that small business is thevarious crop sources, and biodiesel from wastes;
least able to absorb high energy costs and that it- Support for government spending on research
dominates many energy-intensive industries. Theand development, pilot projects and other
energy crisis is squeezing profit margins of smallinitiatives to spur development of energy
firms from different sources. Consequently, theyproducts that can compete in the free market;
are at a competitive disadvantage to their large,- Support for an increase in fuel efficiency. At one
corporate counterparts who, through economiestime McCain supported raising the fuel economy
of scale, can afford equipment and technology toof vehicles to 36 mpg by 2016;
reduce energy use. Firms with larger capital and- Make permanent a tax credit that businesses
production resources also maintain a greatercan use for research and development;
capacity to negotiate favorable prices for inputsThis sounds good, has long-term prospects as well
from suppliers and to control the price ofas shorter-term solutions, but since this is gleaned
products sold. In other words, large companiesfrom a number of speeches, statements and
can more easily weather this storm than smallposition that McCain has made both as a senator
companies. No surprises there. Sometimes sizeand as a presidential candidate, it is difficult to
does matter. Still, it ought to raise some hacklesknow how his final energy plan will work out. While
that the pinch that you and your business areit is certain that the cap-and-trade systems would
feeling today was predicted two years ago! Howlead to higher costs (the Environmental Protection
many small businesses have had to close behindAgency estimates that McCain's proposal would
the energy policies (or lack thereof) to which weadd another $0.68 per gallon of gas by 2050), it is
have been subjected?also certain that a sizable portion of what we can
That is not so easy to determine since a businessconsider McCain's proposal works with resources
closing is usually the result of a number of factors.and technologies that we have today. Unlike the
It is a dead certainty, however, that energy costsother contenders for the Oval Office, McCain
figure prominently in a large number of suchsees energy as a security issue as well. A great
closings. What is clear is that the current crop ofdeal of the money we spend on foreign oil goes
presidential hopefuls doesn't seem to have anyto terrorist organizations. In a way, we are
real plans to do anything decisive about thisfunding both sides of the Iraq War! McCain at
problem.least understands that this has to stop and it has
With his Plan for a Clean Energy Future, Barackto stop soon. Taking advantage of domestic oil
Obama is obviously more interested in climatefields and building nuclear reactors while engaged in
change than energy independence and lower gasresearch and development is a sensible way to go
prices. A look at his campaign website,since it offers a reasonably short-term solution
BarackObama.com, shows that his platform callsfor current problems and it allows us to find truly
for an 80% reduction in carbon emissions byviable answers to the long-term energy problems
2050; a ten-year, $150 billion research andthat we face.
development effort to find "Clean Energy"Will any of these positions make their way into
alternatives including bio-fuels, renewable energylaw? Any one of the three would have to
and clean coal technology; support nextconvince Congress that their plan is the right one.
generation biofuels as well as a low-carbon fuelPartisanship, vested interests, lobbyists and other
standard and an increase in renewable fuels byobstacles will stand in the way for good or ill, but
2030; reduce oil consumption by at least 35% bythat is the nature of our system of government.
2030 with higher fuel economy standards, doublingWe are not yet there, however. We still have
them within the next 18 years. Finally, he wantscandidates to nominate and an election to finish.
to increase energy efficiency by 50% by 2030How these candidates approach the energy issue
and restore the U.S. to a leadership position onwill have ramifications for years to come. It is as
the issue of climate change.important as taxes, defense, gun control or any
While there is not one thing in this plan that oneof the other hot-button political issues we face
can disagree with, they are all good ideas andthis year.
should go forward, one has to ask how much ofFar be it from this Blog to tell you who to vote
this depends on technology that is currently triedfor, but before you throw your support behind
and true and how much of it depends onone candidate or another, consider how their
developing new technology? If a plan depends onpositions will affect your livelihood. As a small
something yet to be invented or perfected, thenbusiness owner you can no longer afford to be a
that plan has some serious faults to it. Of course,straight-ticket kind of voter. You need to look at
the primary fault is that it does nothing towho will create the best climate for you to do
address the problems that we face here andbusiness. Can you afford more of the same
now. Perhaps his opponent can do better:pie-eyed promises of new technology solving all
According to her campaign websiteour problems or do you want solutions for
(HillaryClinton.com), Hillary has a bold andproblems you are facing today? Think carefully.
comprehensive plan to address America's energyThere is a lot riding on your decision.
and environmental challenges that will establish a