Faith Based Sustainability - Going Green For The Greater Good

As a Unitarian Universalist and a liberal religiousto him for it".
faith, I'm confident that environmental stewardship"Since this declaration,"Harmer says, "considerable
is important in my religious community. Ourefforts have been made to move away from
Seventh Principle charges us to "respect theecologically detrimental Christian theological
interdependent web of all existence of which weconcepts and towards an inclusive theology that
are a part." UU churches often seem to grow outembraces the whole of creation; the intention of
of the very ground in which they're planted, withthis revised theology is to encourage all Christians
a preponderance of yurt-like buildings, and anto become communally more practically involved
emphasis on union with the environment.in efforts to resolve ecological concerns."
The Unitarian Universalist Association has aPerhaps not surprisingly, the growing religious drive
Ministry for the Earth, and my own church istoward sustainability is divided along similar lines as
actively seeking Green Sanctuary certificationgeneral scientific thought on climate change issues,
through that ministry, working hard to sustainablyand often hinges on Third World poverty
walk our ecological talk.concerns.
But beyond us, within larger religious communitiesA 2007 Wall Street Journal article titled,
where we often part company on the basis of"Environmentalism splits Evangelical Community,"
creed or dogma, a growing stewardshipobserves:
movement appears to herald something of a"The National Association of Evangelicals' vice
cosmic shift in mainstream theology.president for governmental affairs, Richard Cizik,
Can churches succeed where government stalls?has ... been a prominent supporter for "creation
Can we connect with an environmental ethiccare." Nervous about associating themselves with
inherent in the lives of all people that wouldscientists or big-government environmentalists,
change lifestyles and social structures to positivelythey broadly argue that Christians have a duty to
impact our environment?nurture God's creation, and to fight global warming
In a dissertation titled, "Faith-Based Environmentaldue to the harm it would cause the poor. The
Groups in the United States and Their Strategiesgreen evangelicals have come under attack from
for Change," written by Angela M. Smith, of thetheir peers for bad theology, bad science and
Center for Environmental Studies, at Browndistracting people from more pressing campaigns.
University last May, Smith observes that the"
modern environmental movement has its roots inThe rift manifests itself in two camps: The
the spirituality of its forebears such as ThoreauInterfaith Stewardship Alliance (ISE) and the
and Muir.Evangelical Climate Initiative (ECI)
"Today," she writes, "that spirituality can be still beThe Interfaith Stewardship Alliance who's slogan
seen in the secular, ecofeminist, andfeatures the unlikely combination of words
environmental justice segments of the"Dominion, Stewardship, Conservation," is an
present-day environmental movement." - thingsevangelical organization that questions the scientific
we, as UU, recognize and to which we readilyconsensus on global warming.
respond.The ISA wants, "a proper and balanced Biblical
However, she notes three significant reasons forview of stewardship to the critical issues of
the increase in overall faith based stewardshipenvironment and development." It takes as its
movements:unifying statement, the Cornwall Declaration, a
1) Increased attention from mainstream press fordocument published by the Acton Institute in
religious calls to environmental action;2000 . The Acton Institute is a think tank and
2) A crisis of conscience in the secularadvocacy institute "Integrating Judeo-Christian
environmental movement, which has beenTruths with Free Market Principles."
criticized for its failure to promote broader ethicalThe Cornwall Declaration sets the stage thusly:
principles;"The past millennium brought unprecedented
3) Faith-based environmentalism being seen as aimprovements in human health, nutrition, and life
way to recapture earlier calls by people like Aldoexpectancy, especially among those most blessed
Leopold for an environmental ethic to guide ourby political and economic liberty and advances in
relationships with the natural world if widespreadscience and technology. At the dawn of a new
degradation is to cease.millennium, the opportunity exists to build on these
"An environmental ethic inherent in the lives ofadvances and to extend them to more of the
nearly all individuals, "suggests Smith, " wouldearth's people.
change lifestyles and social structures in such a"At the same time, many are concerned that
way that the number of environmental issuesliberty, science, and technology are more a threat
arising would dramatically decrease. In theory,to the environment than a blessing to humanity
people would simply live justly and responsiblyand nature. Out of shared reverence for God and
with the earth, and there would be no conflictHis creation and love for our neighbors, we Jews,
between whether or not to drill for oil in a nationalCatholics, and Protestants, speaking for ourselves
refuge, for example, or to better promote publicand not officially on behalf of our respective
transportation since one would simply know whatcommunities, joined by others of good will, and
the ethically correct solution to such a problemcommitted to justice and compassion, unite in this
would be."declaration of our common concerns, beliefs, and
Smith notes, too, that: "While the faith-basedaspirations."
environmental movement is growing, theThe Cornwall Declaration identifies three areas of
proportion of the adult American population that is"common misunderstanding":
Christian has declined from 86% in 1990 to 77%1. Many people mistakenly view humans as
in 2001 . The percentage of non-Christian adultsprincipally consumers and polluters rather than
has remained fairly steady, only increasing in tenproducers and stewards. And "ignore our potential,
years by less than half a percent, to reach 3.7%.as bearers of God's image, to add to the earth's
In addition, there is a trend wherein theabundance." causing, "...The tendency among some
percentage of adults who identify themselvesto oppose economic progress in the name of
with a particular religious denomination has steadilyenvironmental stewardship is often sadly
declined from 90% in 1991 to 81% in 2001.self-defeating."
"...Evangelical Christian churches and those that are2. Many people believe that "nature knows best,"
nondenominational, on the other hand, have seenor that the earth-untouched by human hands-is
the most significant increases in membership overthe ideal. Such romanticism leads some to deify
the past decade. The Roman Catholic church,nature or oppose human dominion over creation.
bolstered by immigrants, has likewise seen anOur position, informed by revelation and
increase in number of adherents. That being said,confirmed by reason and experience, views
an additional group that has witnessed importanthuman stewardship that unlocks the potential in
increases in numbers consists of individuals whocreation for all the earth's inhabitants as good. ....
profess no religion. This suggests that theseHuman life, says this doctrine, "must be cherished
changing patterns have as much to do with aand allowed to flourish. The alternative-denying the
rejection of faith as they do with the seeking ofpossibility of beneficial human management of the
different faiths among Americans."earth-removes all rationale for environmental
Might the common search for a sustainingstewardship.
environmental ethic become the engine that3. While some environmental concerns are well
drives our theologies in a new direction? Therefounded and serious, others are without
are many religiously driven efforts underway tofoundation or greatly exaggerated.
help people think about the world in new ways,Among the concluding goals of the document:
and Smith breaks them down into three- We aspire to a world in which human beings
categories:care wisely and humbly for all creatures, first and
- Christian stewardshipforemost for their fellow human beings,
- Creation spiritualists andrecognizing their proper place in the created order.
- Eco-justice advocates- We aspire to a world in which liberty as a
Within the category of Christian stewardship,condition of moral action is preferred over
which includes aspects of the creation spiritualitygovernment-initiated management of the
and eco-justice, divisions occur, even as groupsenvironment as a means to common goals.
try to move forward in their search for a unifying- We aspire to a world in which the relationships
theory of religious stewardship.between stewardship and private property are
Often, differences hinge on principles offully appreciated, allowing people's natural incentive
eco-justice, the main difference betweento care for their own property to reduce the
Protestant and Catholic environmentalism, notesneed for collective ownership and control of
Smith. "In Protestant environmentalism,resources and enterprises, and in which collective
eco-justice is only one among many approachesaction, when deemed necessary, takes place at
to solving the environmental crisis. Withinthe most local level possible.
Catholicism, ... it seems to hold greater weight."- We aspire to a world in which widespread
To me, that makes the intensity of faith basedeconomic freedom-which is integral to private,
environmental efforts, even more poignant.market economies-makes sound ecological
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, in the foreword to astewardship available to ever greater numbers.
global effort called the Earth Bible Project, put it- We aspire to a world in which advancements in
this way:agriculture, industry, and commerce not only
"Planet Earth is in crisis. More and more lifeminimize pollution and transform most waste
systems are being threatened. Scientists estimateproducts into efficiently used resources but also
that at least half, and perhaps as many as 80%improve the material conditions of life for people
of the world's animal and plant species, are foundeverywhere.
in the rainforests. The rainforests are the lungs ofSigners of the doctrine include the American
the planet producing much of the oxygen thatBaptist Association, the Catholic Church, the
humans and other oxygen-dependent creaturesEpiscopal Church , the Evangelical Lutheran Church,
need to survive. The rainforests, alas, are stillthe Mennonites, the Presbyterian Church ,
being destroyed at an alarming rate.Seventh Day Adventists, and the United
"Resolving the ecological crisis of our planet,Methodist Church.
however, is no longer a problem we can leave toThe Evangelical Climate Initiative takes a different
the scientists. Just as are all part of the problem,tack, stating, "The same love for God and
we are also part of the solution. We all need toneighbor that compels us to preach salvation
come to terms with the forces that havethrough Jesus Christ, protect the unborn,
created this crisis and the resources within ourpreserve the family and the sanctity of marriage,
traditions that can motivate us to resolve theand take the whole Gospel to a hurting world, also
crisis. One of those traditions is our biblicalcompels us to recognize that human-induced
heritage."climate change is a serious Christian issue requiring
The Earth Bible project seeks to "develop a setaction now."
of principles to re-read the biblical text from anThe ECI has issued their own statement, called
ecojustice perspective." The project seeks not to"Climate Change: An Evangelical Call to Action1:
defend biblical text blindly, says Tutu, but toHuman-Induced Climate Change is Real
"identify those passages which may have2: The Consequences of Climate Change Will Be
contributed to the crisis and to uncover thoseSignificant, and Will Hit the Poor the Hardest
traditions which have valued Earth but been3: Christian Moral Convictions Demand Our
suppressed."Response to the Climate Change Problem
It's a complex effort, at best, and the Earth Bible4: The need to act now is urgent. Governments,
Team acknowledges that "much of the Bible doesbusinesses, churches, and individuals all have a role
not seem to reflect a religious worldview thatto play in addressing climate change starting now.
was particularly sensitive towards the naturalThe preamble to "An Evangelical Call to Action"
environment."asserts:
Yet they nevertheless hope to uncover"As American evangelical Christian leaders, we
"suppressed Earth traditions that resist therecognize both our opportunity and our
dominant patriarchal anthropocentric orientation ofresponsibility to offer a biblically based moral
the text, "" Readings from the Perspective of thewitness that can help shape public policy in the
Earth" the first part of the Earth Bible project,most powerful nation on earth, and therefore
lays out six eco-justice principles:contribute to the well-being of the entire world.
Whether we will enter the public square and offer
1. The Principle of Intrinsic Worth:our witness there is no longer an open question.
2. The Principle of Interconnectedness:We are in that square, and we will not withdraw."
3. The Principle of Voice:ECI says, "Poor nations and poor individuals have
4. The Principle of Purpose:fewer resources available to cope with major
5. The Principle of Mutual Custodianship: Earth is achallenges and threats. The consequences of
balanced and diverse domain where responsibleglobal warming will therefore hit the poor the
custodians can function as partners with, ratherhardest, in part because those areas likely to be
than rulers over, Earth to sustain its balance and asignificantly affected first are in the poorest
diverse Earth community.regions of the world. Millions of people could die in
6. The Principle of Resistance: Earth and itsthis century because of climate change, most of
components not only suffer from humanthem our poorest global neighbors."
injustices but actively resist them in the struggle"The basic task for all of the world's inhabitants is
for justice.to find ways now to begin to reduce the carbon
This first volume identifies many problematicdioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels
biblical texts, including an analysis of the Book ofthat are the primary cause of human-induced
Amos, which is full of a lot of God-ordainedclimate change."
pummeling of the earth and withholding of vitalSignatories include "Rick Warren, author of "A
natural resources, like rain.Purpose-Driven Life", and the founder of the Lake
It also looks at Psalm 8, which declares that GodForest, Ca.-based Saddleback Church, a
has made man "little less than a god, crowning himmegachurch of 20,000 to 25,000; Rich Stearns,
with glory and honor. Thou makest him masterthe president of World Vision; Todd Bassett, the
over all thy creatures; thou hast put everythingSalvation Army national commander, David Neff
under his feet: all sheep and oxen, all the wildand Timothy George; the editor and executive
beast, the birds in the air and the fish in the sea,editors respectively of Christianity Today; Duane
and all that moves along the paths of ocean." --Litfin, the president of Wheaton College; and Leith
an assertion which leads one Earth Bible ProjectAnderson, the former president of the National
author to conclude that "the Earth's interests areAssociation of Evangelicals (NAE) . "
certainly not central.""We believe the problem is serious," says ECI, "
And then there's Hebrews 6:7-8, which reads,but that cost-effective solutions are available that
"When the earth drinks in the rain that falls upon itwill also create jobs, clean up our environment,
from time to time, and yields a useful crop tomake us more efficient, and reduce our
those for whom it is cultivated, it is receiving itsdependence on foreign oil, thereby enhancing our
share of blessing from God; but if it bears thornsnational security. Working together, and with God's
and thistles, it is worthless and God's curse hangshelp, we can make a difference."
over it; the end of that is burning." Now there'sISA argues back :"With the general assertions
some hefty heavenly precedent for slashing andthat Christians must care about climate change
burning.because we love God and are called to love our
Most mainstream religious environmentalneighbors and that God has given us stewardship
movements, though, are driven by basic relationalover the earth, we agree. But these address
and ethical questions like the one Rev. Dr. Davidmotive. They do not specify action.
Pickering of the UK, "What on Earth has the"The specific actions demanded by the ECI are
environment got to do with church?" (Bible"to find ways now to begin to reduce the carbon
Society, 2003)dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels
"...Many in the church categorize environmentalthat are the primary cause of human-induced
issues as the preserve of civil society - ," writesclimate change" and to "help the poor adapt to
Rev. Pickering. "They do their bit at such places asthe significant harm that global warming will cause."
the recycling bank, or put the environment on theBut (we believe), the harms caused by
busy church agenda along with a range of issuesmandatory CO2 emissions reductions will almost
competing for their attention. However, it iscertainly outweigh the benefits, especially to the
increasingly recognized that good stewardship ofpoor, for whom the marginal increases in prices
the environment or creation care is a core part ofwill be a much greater burden than for the rich.
discipleship; it is undertaken as part of a Christian"The world's poor are much better served by
response to the God of creation, rather than asenhancing their wealth through economic
an optional extra within church life. Churches alsodevelopment than by whatever minute reductions
report that environmental initiatives are anmight be achieved in future global warming by
effective mechanism for Christian missionreducing CO2 emissions. It is difficult to imagine
because they can help the church engage withhow it could possibly be that, as the ECI claims,
society on what is arguably one of the most"The basic task for all of the world's inhabitants is
pressing issues of the twenty-first century."to find ways now to begin to reduce the carbon
There, in a nutshell, you have it: Faith baseddioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels
sustainability helps churches engage with societythat are the primary cause of human-induced
on one of the most pressing issues of the 21stclimate change."
century, the common ground of our increasingly"Millions of poor people in developing countries die
ravaged planet and our hopes for staying alive onevery year because they lack clean water and
it.indoor plumbing, electricity (forcing them to burn
Pickering has a different perspective on questionswood and dung for cooking and heating and to
of Biblical precedence for caring for the Earth.live without refrigeration and air conditioning),
"Whilst the word "environment" is not found in thesewage treatment, jobs, access to affordable
Bible," he writes, " - the importance ofmedical care, and adequate nutrition-not to
environmental care is implicit in many texts.mention just and orderly legal and economic
Genesis 1-2 records two different creation stories,systems. Not only will the policies proposed by the
each of which set out aspects of a properECI not solve any of these real, present, and
relationship between God, humanity and the restvast problems, but instead they will slow down
of the created order.and in some cases prevent their being solved-
"Rather than being an ordered or scientific"...It is immoral and harmful to Earth's poorest
account of the origins of the cosmos the story ofcitizens," says ISA, " to deny them the benefits
creation in six days conveys the message thatof abundant, reliable, affordable electricity and
everything is dependent for its existence andother forms of energy ... merely because it is
meaning upon the sovereign God. The culminationproduced by using fossil fuels. Foreseeable forms
of creation, with the Sabbath as a day of restof renewable energy ... won't provide reliable,
and celebration, reminds us that worship is theaffordable electricity at least for many years, in
first response to God the creator.amounts that are adequate and necessary for
"Christian environmental care should naturally flowmodern hospitals, factories, homes, communities
from this," writes Pickering. " The creation storyand nations. To tell poor families, communities, and
includes a refrain "and God saw that it was good",nations that they can't develop hydroelectric or
which indicates that creation does not exist justnuclear energy either, because some people
for what humanity can get out of it, but hasdisapprove of them, is unconscionable.
value in God's eyes. The refrain reminds humanity"...We agree that it is wise to pursue increasing
that the whole created order is to be respectedenergy efficiency through the development of
with integrity rather than relentlessly exploited."new technologies. But a program that can only be
Adding man to the mix, says Pickering, and indone by government mandate is by definition not
"God's image" no less, "reflects the privilege anda program that the market deems cost effective.
responsibility we are given. ...the privilege to enjoyWe believe the market is a better judge of cost
the gift of creation and a responsibility for thoseeffectiveness than bureaucrats and politicians.
made in the image of God to live according to hisWhat are needed are prudent policies that reflect
teaching."actual risks, costs, and benefits; an honest
An entirely new discipline has arisen here: Anevaluation of sound scientific, economic, and
Eco-theology. Some have been at the leadingtechnological data; and unbiased application of
edge of this trend for years - Connie Barlow andmoral, ethical, and theological principles."
Michael Dowd, come to mind immediately, withSo who's right? Do the nuances of position even
their traveling 'Great Story" , which they'vematter so much as the fact that positions are
brought to Spirit of Life a couple of times now,actually being taken on environmental stewardship
and which meshes evolution with spirituality.by mainstream denominations?
But only recently has ecotheology really comeWhen I first began exploring the differing camps
into the common religious vernacular.of ecotheology, I was inclined to side with ECI -
In, "Eco-Congregation: A successful blend ofwe must do drastic and difficult things now to
theology and ecology?" a dissertation publishedsave the earth. But as I read on, I began to see
just this past May by Catherine Harmer, Harmerthe logic, as well, of ISAs implications that we
writes, " The academic discipline of 'ecotheology' isshouldn't throw the Third World babies out with
still relatively new and some scholars find itthe contaminated bath water. How do we balance
difficult to reconcile the relationship betweenenvironmental stewardship with economic and
theology and ecology.social justice ? How do we find a common
"Christianity has been, and is still often, accused oflanguage from which to proceed?
being a major contributory factor of the global"In spite of their limited capacity and difficulty in
ecological crisis. Although it generally advocatesfinding a common language, however" notes
caring for creation, Christianity has frequentlyAngela Smith, " ... faith-based environmental
been rebuked for not always practicing what itgroups ... bring something novel and important to
preaches. In addition to Christianity's supposed lackthe table of the broader environmental
of positive action, some Christian doctrines aremovement. Their skill in joining together diverse
also perceived to be detrimental influences ongroups of people, their sense of hope and
humanity's treatment of the planet."optimism that change is possible, the strength of
Harmer, however, like Pickering before her,their convictions, and their work on changing
believes that Christianity is not intrinsically aversevalues complement and improve upon the work
to ecological issues and that positive actions areof mainstream environmental organizations. On
being taken within the Church to improvethe whole, because of characteristics such as
ecological circumstances.these, the religious-environmental movement has
"... It is understandable that the misinterpretationgreat potential to bring about lasting environmental
and abuse of theological concepts such aschange in a large number of people and
'dominion', 'free-will' and 'eternal life', for example,institutions. It has just to convince others of that
have led to the accusation that Christianity is apotential to realize what it is capable of
major contributory factor of the world's ecologicalaccomplishing."
crisis, " notes Harmer."...Every prescription is likely to have both positive
The real question, Harmer quotes UKand negative consequences-for different aspects
environmentalist Jonathon Porritt as saying, is "notof the environment, different species, different
so much whether or not Christ would voteregions, and different groups of people," observes
Green, but whether or not the Church wouldECI. "...and we hope our evangelical brothers and
have him declared a heretic for so doing!"sisters, and all who are concerned not just about
Harmer underscores that Green Christianity is notglobal warming but about other threats to human
new, only newly popular, and she points to 'Anand planetary well being, will study it carefully."
Evangelical Declaration on the Care of Creation'Perhaps,in the long run, seriously studying the
issued in 1994 'to assert and emphasize that thisissues will, in fact, become the common ground
Earth belongs to God and that we are responsibleon which we can all sustainably stand.