Global Warming - The Real Scandal

History and Motivations:by the release of greenhouse gases from fossil
It has long been known that greenhouse gasesfuel burning.
contribute to global warming. In 1827,However, greenhouse gases are not the only
Jean-Baptiste Fourier suggested that greenhouseinfluence on temperature, there are other man
gases kept the earth warmer, whilst in 1938 anmade and natural causes at work, some which
Engineer, Guy Stewart Callendar predicted thatcause cooling as well as heating, and to determine
doubling the concentration of carbon dioxide fromthe precise effect of each, these need be
fossil fuel burning would lead to a global increaseisolated. To do this requires the use of more
of 2 °C, with the poles warming more. This wasdetailed models that have been produced
a remarkable prediction, since it is exactly oncompared and scrutinised by some of the world's
course to what we observe today! Calendar'sfinest climate scientists.
predictions were later confirmed by severalClimate models combine all this data together and
independent but more detailed studies in theconfirm the common sense notion based on
1970s, including one by an elite group oftemperature trends and satellite measurements
ex-military physicist's dubbed the 'Jason's'. By thethat greenhouse gases are mainly responsible for
1990s professional climate scientists armed withthe current surge in global warming and will
an extensive range of measurements andcontinue to cause substantial further increases
calculations had removed all reasonable doubt thatunless they are substantially reduced. However,
human activity was causing global warming. Evenalthough the basics behind global warming are
scientists in the oil industry agreed with them.firmly established and is well supported by
So only as the evidence became undeniable didobservations, science of this type always throws
the fossil fuel businesses realise they might haveup odd anomalies. This provides opportunities for
confront the growing political pressure to reduceDeniers to misrepresent and undermine the
global warming. As a consequence, they employedconclusions reached by the substantial majority of
a host of public relations experts, many who hadscientists on what must be the most studied and
successfully delayed regulations against thescrutinised phenomenon in mankind's history.
tobacco industry, to weave a web ofThe Implications:
misinformation using a variety of unscrupulousGlobal warming Denierism unlike other lunatic
media and various 'junk science' websites. Theirconspiracy theories such as the 'faked moon
methods were not based on physical science butlanding' would be amusing if it wasn't so
psychology by targeting uneducated anddangerous, irresponsible and selfish if not down
scientifically illiterate people using tried and testedright criminal. This is something that cannot be
methods of persuasion. This included peereasily reversed. Once the Arctic sea ice melts in
pressure, misrepresentation, over-simplisticsummer, the sunlight is absorbed onto the darker
arguments, reiteration of falsehoods, attacks onsurface of the water, this warms the surface
individuals and groups, and claimed threats onfurther. Also when the land permafrost melts,
personal liberty and wealth.masses of the potent greenhouse gas methane
The main object was not to win, but provide thewill be released. Both these lead to what climate
impression of an informed 'debate' and to castscientists call a positive feedback effect, a rapid
'sufficient doubt' on climate science by spreadingincrease in global temperature which cannot be
confusion and uncertainty. This would allow thesesubsequently controlled by reducing greenhouse
businesses to fight a delaying action to avoidgases. In addition to the reduction in sea ice area
regulation and thereby impose an enormous costin recent years there has been substantial thinning
to future society. This highly co-ordinatedof the ice, and there was probably less volume of
campaign has lately been supplemented byice in September 2009 than in any previous year
attacks on the climate scientists themselves usingin recorded history. In fact the Arctic sea ice is on
misleading cherry picked extracts from stolencourse for disappearing completely within a few
Emails attempting to implicate them in fraud. Yetdecades during the summer months.
what a close examination of these documentsBe aware that the information from the
reveal is a genuine but frustrated profession whoIntergovernmental panel on Climate Change
are constantly being misquoted, misrepresented(IPCC) will usually be out of date by the time it is
and attacked by media savvy and politicallypublished, and it is always conservatively written
motivated groups.due to political pressure. In the last report they
Whilst more than 97% of scientists who arehad to tone down statements about climate
active publishers in the field of climate changefeedback effects that should have been
accept the reality of AGW (anthropogenic oremphasised. This is itself worrying since the worst
human induced global warming), a very smallcase scenarios are by far the most costly and
number of climate scientists and non-specialistsdisruptive and should be entered into the overall
lured by money from the fossil fuel lobby havecost benefit equation. It is akin to your insurance
been successfully recruited into the Climate Denialcompany not allowing for the possibility of your
camp. Their names often appear in petitionshouse burning down because it is unlikely to
mixed with fake identities and even thehappen! No wonder the IPCC have been accused
decreased, to make it appear as if there is aof corruption for not being alarmist enough! It
substantial proportion of scientists which opposeseems they are stuck between a 'Rock and Hard
the AGW consensus.Place'.
The Scientific Reality:The US military provide a useful independent view
AGW isn't just a theory predicted by models, thison global warming and are far less reticent about
effect can be experimentally observed in thethese issues. In their report 'National Security and
laboratory and a large number of sensors andthe threat of Climate Change', they include a
instruments rely on the same principles tosection on 'abrupt climate change' not addressed
function. Moreover, satellites have measured aby the IPCC scenarios which include the possibility
significant decrease in outgoing radiation at theof the rapid increase of sea level due to the
wavelength bands associated with the mainbreak-up of glaciers caused by these feedback
greenhouse gases as their concentrations haveeffects.
increased. This provides direct experimentalBased on all this evidence, one might think any
evidence of the greenhouse effect in theClimate Denier would have to be very sure
atmosphere and removes any doubt that thebefore challenging the established view, yet they
increase in greenhouse gases MUST be havingresort to a variety of unscrupulous techniques
some effect.ranging from distortion to outright lies. This
A large number of studies using a variety ofdemonstrates either their naivety or callousness
direct and proxy measurements of historicalof their ideology.
temperature and greenhouse gas concentrationsUnless rapid action is taken to circumvent the
further support AGW. Combining these tell us thatonset of irreversible warming it will be impossible
the present world climate has probably neverto stop the large-scale loss of habitat and
been warmer over the last one to two thousandlarge-scale land loss resulting in human migration,
years than at present and possibly for as long assubstantial economic cost and political turmoil in
one hundred thousand years. More importantly itthe long term. In view of the need to find
shows that there has been an unprecedentedalternative energy sources as well, the argument
warming over the last hundred years and infor concerted action to prevent global warming is
particular the last thirty. The probability that thisindisputable.
change has occurred naturally just as we haveThe common myths and answers to global
released vast quantities of greenhouse gases intowarming questions are widely available from
the atmosphere is very unlikely even if we ignorereputable sources but are simply ignored by
the more direct evidence from satellites andclimate Deniers because their purpose is not to
calculations. As all other reasonable influences haveinform but confuse and mislead. Don't be swindled
been extensively studied and discounted, we canby them or allow their own ignorance or selfish
be assured beyond reasonable doubt that themotives destroy opportunities for future
current bout of global warming is mainly causedgenerations.