New SEC Guidance on Climate Change Disclosure

eerencWhat does the Securities and Exchange"credits" (businesses emitting below their quota)
Commission (SEC) have to do with sustainability?may be able to sell them as investment
On January 27th, 2010 the SEC published guidanceinstruments to improve their own capital position.
for public companies on the reporting of impactsLet's not forget the potential physical effects of
potentially contributing towards climate change.climate change. Sea level rise, melting of
Additionally, they disclose the effects climatepermafrost, availability of clean water, greater
change may and can have on a company'stemperature extremes, and increase in storm
profitability. While some public and corporateintensity can all have deleterious effects on a
officials are stating that the risks cannot as yetcompany's operation and even demand for their
be properly assessed and the requirements areproducts. For example, warmer winters may
premature, most major investors, which havereduce seasonal demand for heating supplies, while
been supporting the new guidelines, are pleased.a burst of extreme cold can overwhelm
Why has the SEC taken this action and is thisdistribution infrastructures; banks holding significant
information really pertinent to an investor?debt in coastal properties could be at higher risk;
Let's take a look at what has been occurring overdrought or flooding could negatively impact
the past decade. Many states and localagricultural firms.
governments have enacted their own legislationAccording to the SEC, the new disclosure
resulting in greater regulation of greenhouse gasguidance is simply an extension of regulations
emissions (GHG). GHG legislation on climate changepertaining to environmental issues implemented in
is currently pending in Congress after the Housethe early 1970's. Focused primarily on disclosure
of Representatives approved a bill, later amendedguidelines, the original rules sought to monitor
in 2009 by the Senate, to limit a company'scompliance regarding material discharge and
emissions of greenhouse gases through a systemenvironmental protection, for use in potential
of "Cap and Trade". Even the EPA has begun tolitigation. The current standards have evolved to
require large emitters to disclose and report their"provide that information is material if there is a
data.substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor
Since the 1990's, 186 countries have supportedwould consider it important in deciding how to
the efforts of the Kyoto Protocol, and thevote or make an investment decision, or, put
European Union Emissions Trading System (EUanother way, if the information would alter the
ETS) which is the mechanism that controls thetotal mix of available information." ( Search "SEC
Cap and Trade system of allowances and creditsRelease #33-9106" )
for carbon and other greenhouse gases. While theTo the CFO, properly assessing risk can be a
U.S. has never ratified this treaty, U.S. companiescomplex issue, especially when considering the
doing business in those countries are required toeffect climate change may have on future
comply.company operations. Granted, there is a delicate
Climate change risk has not gone unnoticed bybalance in disclosure between compliance and
the insurance industry. In their 2008 report, majorstock valuation and demand. Currently, companies
investment firm Ernst & Young stated thatwho are making some efforts on disclosing
climate change was the top strategic risk. Theyclimate change risks are simply "burying" them in
explain it as being, "long-term, far-reaching, andtheir 10-K form. It appears this practice is no
with significant impact on the industry" (Climatelonger acceptable with the new guidance
Change Greatest Strategic Risk to Insurancerequirements.
Industry). It remained on the top 10 for 2009Are there any actions a company facing climate
(Top 10 Risks Most Likely to Affect the Insurancechange risks may employ to comply with the full
Sector During 2009). Partially as a result of thesedisclosure requirements and still show the
reports, the National Association of Insurancecompany in a positive light? One method
Commissioners (NAIC) created an industrysuggested is certification, primarily through an
standard of mandatory disclosure. Designed forinternationally recognized program and certification
state regulators, it highlights potential financial risksbody. The International Standards Organization
due to climate change as well as actions taken to(ISO) has developed their ISO 14001:2004
mitigate them. New actuarial models are inEnvironmental Management System to assist
development along with new products specificallycompanies in developing or transitioning to more
designed to cover these new risks.sustainable systems and practices. Their newly
So what are the risks to a public company?developed standards ISO 14064 and 14065
Legislation and new regulations can certainly haveprovide an internationally accepted framework for
a significant effect on capital expenditures. Capmeasuring GHG emissions and verifying claims.
and trade allowances could also force a highIn our next article, we will examine the details and
emitter to buy credits, creating a negative effectrequirements of the new SEC guidance, discuss
on cash flow. Even companies not subject to newthe potential benefits of a certification program,
regulations could be affected if their own suppliesand also measure the relevance this action has on
and services are suddenly only available at anon-public companies.
higher cost. As with any challenge, there will beReferences:
companies well-positioned to benefit from currentClimate Change Greatest Strategic Risk...
and proposed legislation. For example, those withTop 10 Risks Most Likely...