No Award For Ivory's Inaccurate Atrazine Story

The Huffington Post Investigative Fund's Daniellehas exceeded federal safety limits. This is
Ivory was a finalist for the Investigativeincorrect. The federal safety limit for atrazine is
Reporters and Editors investigative journalismthree parts per billion based on an annual average.
award for an article she wrote on atrazine. MaybeThis is specified in the Safe Drinking Water Act's
she didn't win because her story was inaccurate.standards for atrazine.  While test results showed
Sure, I crossed over to the "dark side" leavingatrazine levels well above 3 parts per billion in
newspaper journalism for public relations, but I stillsome cases, those were found in individual weekly
remember my news roots. Those roots go backtests that were part of a program designed to
to ink-scented offices at my college newspaper,take a closer look at atrazine levels in certain
then at the historic Emporia Gazette in Emporia,areas. The EPA drinking water limits are based on
Kan.  The pay wasn't great, but I gained aan "annual average" and not individual readings. If
fortune in news smarts from some amazing (andthe writer was not aware of this, her editors
often grumpy) editors.  A lazily written storyshould have been. The atrazine levels in water in
was always challenged with red ink. Notes to thethese areas fall well within the EPA's drinking
side like "attribution?", "source?" or "prove it!" werewater standards. In fact, there have been no
common even in the simplest of stories. Opinionviolations of the drinking water standards
was to be left on page four, and you had betteranywhere in the U.S. since 2005.
interview sources from each side of a story. LotsAccording to EPA:  "Under the Safe Drinking
of red pens must be sitting unused in today'sWater Act (SDWA), the atrazine Maximum
newsroomsContaminant Level (MCL) is intended to prevent
An example is Danielle Ivory's almostlonger-term, or chronic, health concerns from
award-winning reporting on atrazine. While I tookoccurring even after years of exposure and is
issue with many parts of the story, let's simplycalculated against a running average from four
look at the lead: "One of the nation's mostquarterly samples. An occasional peak
widely-used herbicides has been found to exceedconcentration above 3 ppb is, therefore, not
federal safety limits in drinking water in fourcause for concern. Rather, a long-term, consistent
states, but water customers have not been toldvalue above a yearly average of 3 ppb would be
and the Environmental Protection Agency has notof concern. The MCL is designed to protect all
published the results."population subgroups."
The lead is a little long and, but it does portrayAn editor once told me, if the lead is wrong, the
the breathlessness with which the writer isentire story lacks credibility. He also told me that I
reporting the story. Breathlessness aside, let's lookcouldn't slant a story based on my personal
at the facts in the lead. Ivory states the herbicideagenda. Maybe these rules no longer stand.