No New Findings In Atrazine Study Promoted By Discredited Researcher, According To The Hudson Institute Center For Global Food Issues

Alex Avery, Director of Research and Educationavailable information was scientifically flawed. None
at the Hudson Institute's Center for Global Foodof [Hayes'] laboratory studies on atrazine were
Issues, criticized new research by University ofconducted in accordance with standard protocols.""
California Berkeley professor Dr. Tyrone HayesAvery's own thorough review of past research
alleging endocrine disruption in amphibians causedby Dr. Tyrone Hayes can be found at
by the popular herbicide atrazine.  Prior research"Dr. Tyrone Hayes has spent more than a decade
by Dr. Hayes has come under scientific scrutinyallied with eco-activists peddling scare stories due
and criticism by directors of the Environmentalto alleged health effects from atrazine. Yet
Protection Agency (EPA) for lacking basic scientificdespite his decade-long search and after more
standards and lack of transparency.than 50 years of widespread use of this herbicide
Avery pointed to comments by Anne E. Lindsay,by farmers to minimize soil erosion while
former Deputy Director of EPA's Office ofcombating weeds, Hayes can offer no compelling
Pesticide Programs, testified in 2005 that Dr.real-world evidence that atrazine poses any
Hayes' ‘data are insufficient' to support hisappreciable risk to amphibian populations
claims.  She further noted:anywhere," Avery stated.  "Aside from his own
" . . .[EPA] has never seen either the results fromoften-conflicting lab studies, other researchers
any independent investigator published inhave not seen the effects Hayes claims to have
peer-reviewed scientific journals or the raw datafound. Replication is the gold-standard of science
from Dr. Hayes' additional experiments thatand Hayes' work has failed this test miserably."
confirm Dr. Hayes' conclusions.""Finally, it should be noted that Dr. Hayes is an
The EPA's independent Scientific Advisory Paneladmitted anti-atrazine activist and has aligned
"believed strongly that all of the field studieshimself closely with organizations including Natural
reviewed had serious flaws that limit theirResources Defense Council (NRDC), organizations
usefulness…" and "these problems renderwith a clear track record of campaigns against
interpretation of results problematic if notpopular herbicides, large scale farm production and
impossible."effective tools that have revolutionized agriculture
Lindsay's testimony further invalidated anytoday," Avery concluded.
legitimacy of Hayes' work, saying "all of the