| Some people probably would suggest I started | | | | synchrony with the investment and intellectual |
| the conception of Marketism with the effect such | | | | properties based economics of Marketism which |
| economic expansion would have on the Global | | | | Monetary Policies are adjusted by current |
| environment, to whom and anyone else concern | | | | possibilities of the Markets. |
| about pollution very close of destroying our World | | | | · An advance of High Technologies and |
| this article is directed to. | | | | Expanding Investment combined with regulated |
| Here, I would directly disagree with the "Theory | | | | Global economics structures including tight |
| of Scarce Resources" and this is not because the | | | | Ecological regulations will reduce wasting of these |
| Global Resources are limitless or somehow are to | | | | resources. |
| be enough for the whole population in the way | | | | · Until now the pollution has been mostly |
| these resources are used and have been used: in | | | | generated by the most developed areas of North |
| the opposite the Market Economics called | | | | America and Western Europe, but in the same |
| Marketism is about economic growth synchronized | | | | thought the biggest reduction of pollution for the |
| and constantly adjusted to the most advance | | | | last 10 years has been there too, so unless the |
| renewable energy sources and high technologies | | | | rest of the World does not jump over the |
| reducing and totally eliminating pollution. In context | | | | industrial revolutions already gone in the West the |
| I am tired of hearing about how the majority of | | | | pollution coming from these under-developed |
| the World population should live in poverty not | | | | markets will finish us all. |
| using the existing Global resources in order a very | | | | · The use of resources could be a lot less |
| small percentage to be rich and prosperous to live | | | | by developed markets then by slowly developing |
| as they do, therefore the majority should be | | | | markets, cutting of wood and using of coal for |
| artificially kept less developed. For these | | | | heating is a perfect example of that. Resources |
| "philosophers" I have the following answers: | | | | such as petroleum and even water are wasted |
| · Deregulated "Trickle-down-Economics" | | | | much faster by developing markets then by |
| mixes "freedom" in business is more like | | | | developed markets when these markets are part |
| "wild-wild-West" where alone with the "good guys' | | | | of the Marketism. |
| obeying laws and protecting the weak are the | | | | · High Technologies could be adapted only |
| "bad guys" disobeying laws and skimming the | | | | by advanced markets to lower pollution. |
| World as much as they can. To the proponents | | | | · And here I will come back to the rich or |
| of such "freedom" of business I will say freedom | | | | wealthy as a better description: in a World where |
| is about the rule of law and the goodwill of the | | | | more then 80% of all production is based on |
| wealthy guys to take care of us the rest might | | | | consumption only by expanding the consumption |
| well be not there. Same with the Environment | | | | could expand their capital too, finally they are the |
| that has to be protected by the rule of law not | | | | keepers of the Capital and in a foreseeable future |
| by the trickle down freedom and will be better | | | | I don see them replaced. |
| protected as well. | | | | · To use renewable sources of energy |
| · The constantly enhancing the way of | | | | and enhanced system of production with no |
| protecting the Global environment is in conflict | | | | pollution in a short and only way to avoid total |
| with the production based economics of | | | | Global crash is by changing the excising economics |
| Capitalism, Socialism or Communism and in | | | | into market driven Marketism. |