| Science, creation, and evolution have a lot to say | | | | that is being measured. Data is being discarded in |
| about the age of the earth. But what can we | | | | order to agree with a previous assumption. I.e. |
| actually believe? The evolution theories that have | | | | evolution. |
| been popularized over the last 160 years insist | | | | A more recent case in point where 'scientists ' |
| that the earth is extremely old. Most agree that | | | | have altered data has been the manmade global |
| the earth is around 4.5 billion years old. But is this | | | | warming issue. For those that are unaware of the |
| idea supported by science? The answer is quite | | | | events surrounding this issue, those that have |
| stunning. | | | | been keeping the data for the weather (Even |
| Forty or fifty years ago we were told in our | | | | NASA seems to be caught in this as well as East |
| public schools that a technique existed to measure | | | | Anglia University) were caught red handed |
| the earth's age. This was done by taking rock and | | | | adjusting the numbers to support the manmade |
| testing it. This could only work on rocks that | | | | global warming idea. |
| were made by heat (called igneous rock). This | | | | The most significant fact, common to both, is the |
| does not apply to most rocks because most of | | | | revelation that 'scientists' are not invulnerable to |
| the rocks are sedimentary (made with water). So | | | | changing the information so that they can support |
| far nobody has been able to find a way to | | | | a specific theory or idea. It has now been |
| measure the age of these rocks or any of the | | | | admitted by those who believe in manmade global |
| fossils that are found in them (contrary to what | | | | warming that there has actually been no global |
| we have been told). | | | | warming since 1995. Most of the public and the |
| The results of many of these tests on the | | | | media seem to be completely unaware of this |
| igneous rocks have been shocking. Some of these | | | | amazing revelation. |
| rocks have been assessed to be millions or even | | | | This action of 'fudging' the data has taken place |
| billions of years old. The truth was, according to | | | | with the theory of evolution as well as the |
| historical records, they ended up being just two | | | | manmade global warming theory. There are other |
| hundred years old (and much less in some cases). | | | | facts that show the earth is much younger than |
| Rocks were taken from the recent Mt. St. Helens | | | | previously thought. For instance, the strength of |
| volcano and then tested. The age was said to be | | | | the magnetic field around the earth is decreasing |
| in the hundreds of thousands of years. Many | | | | by 50% every fourteen hundred years. That |
| results have been similar, but the tests have been | | | | would mean our earth would be too hot for any |
| much more devastating. In every case of known | | | | life to exist just 25 thousand years ago. That |
| age the testing has been wrong by astronomical | | | | time frame is not enough for any evolution to |
| amounts. In fact, in every case, you could | | | | occur, if we use the evolutionists' time frames. |
| remove 4 or 5 zero's and the numbers would be | | | | Evolutionists often argue that the magnetic poles |
| much closer to the real figures. This is true in | | | | have had pole reversals in the past. But if that |
| every single case. That would mean that | | | | were the case, a pole reversal has nothing to do |
| measurements that are in the billions of years | | | | with the magnetic strength of an object. If you |
| are,in reality, just thousands of years old. | | | | turn a magnet around it does not weaken the |
| This can all be estimated by just comparing the | | | | magnet significantly, even though the poles are in |
| age of the rock given to us by the test and then | | | | reverse order. In addition, this 'pole reversal' that |
| comparing that to the real age. That kind of error | | | | evolutionists refer to, supposedly took place |
| is literally in the tens of millions of percent. Any | | | | hundreds of thousands of years ago. So it would |
| error that would be over one hundred percent is | | | | have nothing to do with the strength of the |
| gigantic for any scientific discipline. This means | | | | magnetic field 25,000 years ago. |
| that rather than the earth being billions of years | | | | This is just the beginning of serious problems with |
| old, the real numbers would be in the thousands | | | | the theory of evolution. But science proves one |
| or possibly millions of years. | | | | thing. The age of the earth is not nearly as old as |
| The idea of evolution is eliminated if this is the | | | | we have been told. And the theory of evolution |
| case. A very interesting secret has surfaced over | | | | then becomes an impossibility. It doesn't matter |
| the last ten or twenty years. These age | | | | what kind of evolutionary theory we go with, the |
| measurements are often discarded if they do not | | | | age of the earth completely contradicts the |
| agree with the previously accepted age of a rock | | | | theory. |