Sustainability Is an Ambitious Goal for Humans

Sustainability is an ambitious goal for humans. Weto always apply the triple bottom approach.
do however have a chance to create aNowadays, living a "green" life is the talk of the
sustainable environment that will allow the humanday as many people are beginning to realize the
race to endure infinitely. To achieve this we mustconsequences of our actions to the environment.
start with sustaining the earth. The earth providesDespite all the growing scientific evidence of the
the raw materials, which become commodities,detrimental effects of some of our social and
which are used in the development of everythingeconomic activities to the environment, a
essential to life, including food, water, and shelter.significant number of people continue to deny the
Water, land and air, are the basic foundations ofeffects of global warming for ideological reasons.
life that can also serve as representative of ourFor us to achieve the goal of sustainability, we all
resource depletion and sustainability efforts. Theneed to look past our ideological differences and
intangible coexistent requirement for futurefocus on the scientific evidence presented before
sustainability is a strong social or cultureus.
environment that will be responsible for developingThe Green Revolution is a concept that was
processes, policies, laws and other mechanismsemployed to increase the produce of farmers in
that will support sustainability. In 1991, Mohandeveloping countries, so as to fight the famine
Munasinghe and Ernst Lutz said:that was a plaque to some developing countries in
"Sustainable development is an approach that willthe world. Despite the fact that it improves the
permit continuing improvements in the quality ofsocial and economic status in those countries like
life with a lower intensity of resource use,India and Mexico through an increase in food
thereby leaving behind an undiminished or evenproduction, it had its drawbacks on the
enhanced stock of natural resources and otherenvironment. The use of fertilizers and pesticides
assets."led to an increase in soil and water pollution. These
Our goal should be to work toward restoring andcountries depended on primitive water sources
maintaining their function and integrity so that theirfor drinking and irrigation like "wells", streams, and
services and human uses can be sustained overrivers. These water sources got polluted by the
the long term. This can be done by incorporatingchemicals for the fertilizers and pesticides,
triple bottom line in our personal lives. Accordingthereby destroying marine life and other elements
to Lozano (2007) the dominant socio-economicof the ecosystem like the nitrogen fixing bacteria
paradigm, has led to behaviors that arewhich are essential in recycling some of the
increasingly pervasive in our society today. We aselements required to sustain human life. Repeated
individuals should set goals that will help restoreuse of the same piece of farm coupled with the
our global ecosystem, foster healthy living andchemicals and land slide due to irrigation led to soil
reduce our impact on the local environment. Weinfertility; "shifting cultivation" wasn't practiced
should look at our activities and consider some ofanymore. The use of a few genetically engineered
the not-so-positive ways in which we impact theseeds and chemicals led to decrease in crop
future and the globe. We should view in a newdiversity.
way the daily decisions we make about energyAs a consequence of the Green Revolution, there
use, water consumption, recycling, transportationis a steep increase in the world's population today.
and food.The new challenge to the world is to sustain this
The first green revolution was considered a failurerapidly growing population. To do so, we need to
in terms of environment because did not workexplore the field of research and technology
alongside nature. It failed because of badwhich is the main idea behind the Green II
governance. The small farmers were eventuallyRevolution. I believe we can handle these
left behind and were not able to get assistancechallenges by implementing the concepts of Green
with their farms. Their voices were not heard.II Revolution. To me, Green II Revolution is a
The voices of the people who bought the largergood idea. Besides the fact that it minimizes the
farms were heard instead. Alongside this newdrawbacks of the Green Revolution and to cope
pollutants arrived such as pests, petroleum,with the demands of the rising population,
fertilizers, etc… the green revolution turned outeffective investment in research and
to be a failure, they did not listen and take heedbiotechnology will create jobs and other social and
to nature and the local farmers.economic benefits to the people and the
Green 2 revolution is a good idea becausecommunity as a whole. By constantly striving for
hopefully they have learned from past mistakesbetter techniques and production of more humane
and are more keen to understanding and realizingand environmentally friendly pesticides, fertilizers,
what truly needs to be done to sustain. Perhapsand irrigation methods, we can sustain our
this time they will work alongside nature.environment. Knowing that the ecosystem is
According to Rogers there are five elements fordynamic, and that every action we take has its
the new green 2 revolution. They are:pros and cons, we can maintain the welfare of
"1. A redistributive policy that favors the poor byhumans without destroying our environment by
providing them access to land and modern inputs.maintaining a balance between our social,
2. Increased public funding for less favorableeconomic, and environmental activities.
agricultural land.The Green 2 revolution is a good idea to prevent
3. Increased attention to the needs of small holderthe destruction of our environment due to
farms and landless laborers, including credit. increase food production. The Green Revolution
4. Increased investment in rain fed agriculturalwas an agriculture movement in south Asia which
areas in both Asia and Latin America.was initiated to combat starvation in the region.
5. Decentralized agricultural research, development,The Bangladesh imported fuel to run irrigation
and extension systems focusing on particularpumps but the small farmers were turned away
issues such as soil and waterthe subsidized prices and were forced to buy
management"(Rogers, 2008)These are verymore expensive private prices. Bad governance
sound elements and if put to use correctly shouldhurt small farmers. As Spangenberg suggests,
be very successful. They need to work alongsidesustainable Development is based on economic,
nature as well as the local people…what willenvironmental, social and institution. The
sustain the environment yet sustain the peopleinstitutional part was lacking in the first green
too!revolution. Bangladesh small farmers with little
According to the National Environmental Policy Actpolitical influence were also unable to "seeds,
(NEPA) of 1969, the purpose of environmentalfertilizers, roads, and communal storehouses."Both
sustainability is to "foster and promote the generalcircumstances lead to the larger farmers
welfare, to create and maintain conditions underbenefitting more greatly from the green
which man and nature can exist in productiverevolution than small farmers and overall increased
harmony and fulfill the social, economic, and otherthe gap between the wealthy and the
requirements of the present and futureimpoverished. (Rogers 2008).
generations". To achieve this goal, it is vital for us