The Global Warming Swindle...exposed By Respected Scientists

cking truth about the science of global warming is				demand still exceeds supply.
this: It is not due to hydrocarbon use. Fossil fuels				The point is this. The influential media and
have nothing to do with it, in spite of what the				inaccurate reporting by high profile people scare
media and a Nobel prize winner, Al Gore, claim.				the populace into believing lies and
The BBC and Noel Sheppard's published article on				misrepresentations. Why is this so? It seem clear,
Newsbusters.org reports this: "American Media are				it is for perceived economic or political advantage
virtually guaranteed to not report: A British court				by selfish interests.
has determined that Al Gore's schlocumentary				The Canadian Minister of Transportation now says
"An Inconvenient Truth" (video) contains at least				that Canada needs to "pull out" of the Kyoto
eleven material falsehoods."				Accord that they signed. He says that in order
1. Melting snows are not evidence of global				for Canada to comply it would mean banning all
warming				cars and buses from the roads.
2. The co-relation of CO2 levels in ice samples and				It would seem that the U.S. would be even worse
global warming is flawed. CO2 lagged 800 to 2000				off, economically. The typical U.S. urban dweller
years behind the warming.				has multiple cars which would be heavily taxed (if
3. Hurricane Katrina had no possible relationship to				even allowed)... if compliance were made for the
global warming				Kyoto Accord. It would be disastrous for our
4. Drying up of Lake Chad was not related to				civilization in many ways. Do you realize that
global warming				computers alone use 9% of our electricity? The
5. Polar bears are not drowned because of global				majority of our electricity comes from
warming (a violent storm caused 4 to die)				hydrocarbons...fossil fuels.
6. The warming of the gulf stream will not				According to Art Robinson the life we live would
produce an ice age in Europe				come to a screeching halt. There would be no
7. Coral reef losses and killing of species on them				travel allowed and there would be a shut down of
are not due to global warming				energy dependent activities...which is almost
8. Greenland is not in eminent danger of flooding				everything modern.... (assuming the U.S. adopted
due to ice melt				and complied with the Kyoto Accord)
9. Antarctica ice covering is not shrinking. Evidence				It is easy to see how modern society would be
shows it increasing.				completely destroyed; plus, this would have little if
10. Sea levels are not expected to rise over 20 ft				any effect on global warming. It would not solve
in the next 800 years but rather possibly 16				the perceived global warming problem. Taxing
inches				hydrocarbons would accelerate its demise.
11. Evacuation of the South Sea islanders to New				Another flawed premise of global warming was
Zealand was not caused by sea level rises				"the huge increase of destructive carbon dioxide".
Stay with me and I can show you scientific facts				One of the primary increases of CO2 by man is
that clearly refute the notion that hydrocarbon				hydrocarbon combustion. According to U.S.
fuels...coal, oil, gas...cause global warming.				Government statistics, atmospheric concentrations
A firestorm of controversy arose and the United				of CO2 have risen 36% since 1750. There is no
States was shamefully accused of selfish				direct co-relation to hydrocarbon combustion and
interests when they did not sign the Kyoto				subsequent co-relation to global warming. The
Accord. Actually, both the U.S. and Australia were				industrial revolution, with high hydrocarbon usage,
the most significant countries to refuse signing the				came in the last 100 years...over 150 years after
Accord. Enormous polluters like China and				significant CO2 increases were observed. Likewise
emerging countries were exempted from				global temperatures have only increased slightly
compliance until they "catch up" with productions.				since 1750.
It is interesting that arguably the greatest polluter				According to scientist Art Robinson the earth
on earth is China. It is so bad there that recently				produces 40,000 giga-tons of CO2 per year.
a marathoner died and several other runners				(That's 40 million tons per year) Mankind produces
were hospitalized due to the toxic pollution. Some				only 8 giga-tons per year. While this seems like a
long distance runners refused to participate in the				huge amount, it is only 0.54% of all atmospheric
2008 Olympics held in China.				gasses, a minor atmospheric gas. Scientists tell us
What was the Kyoto Accord? It was basically a				ninety five percent of the green house gasses
meeting of world leaders of whom the majority				are water vapor.
signed an agreement in Japan. The accord said we				The one fifth of the earth's CO2... which is that
should limit, reduce, tax and control the use of				produced by man... is not likely to overwhelm the
hydrocarbons worldwide...due to global warming.				planet, it has not in the past. In addition to that,
The information furnished to leaders was greatly				the earth needs CO2 because plants use it to
flawed and should be considered "junk science",				produce oxygen. Plants proliferate in a CO2 rich
totally without scientific facts or truth. The				environment because it is their chief raw material.
discussion and the real reason of warming and				All plants, animals and humans ultimately get their
cooling of the earth were not even allowed at the				(organic) carbon from CO2.
conference.				Dr. Pius Corbyn Climate Forecaster, Weather
Here are some quotes from International				Action (He instituted a far more accurate weather
authorities on the subject:				forecasting paradigm based on sun storms and
1. Professor Richard Lindzen, Dept. of				sun spot changes) Quote: "None of the major
Meteorology, M.I.T. says the global warming				climate changes in the past 1000 years can be
movement is really about getting money. "Funding				explained by CO2."
of from 170 million to 2 billion (2000 million) for				The same conclusion is echoed by Dr. Ian
climate and climate related issues." (has occurred)				ClarkDept. of Earth Sciences, University of
Other scientists believe it is purely politicalin				Ottawa: You "cannot say CO2 causes climate
order to get fundinga lot of jobs now depend				changes: it has not in the past."
upon the global warming myth.				Carbon dioxide is essential to plants and you
2. "Anyone who goes around and says that CO2				ultimately get all of your organic carbon atoms
is responsible for most of the global warming in				from it. CO2 plus chlorophyll plus sunlight produces
the 20th century has not looked at the basic				oxygen...essential to man. Plants need CO2 and
numbers."Professor Patrick Michaels, Dept. of				animals and humans consume the plants for food.
Environment Sciences, University of Virginia.				Increases of carbon dioxide actually increase the
3. "Polar ice caps are always expanding and				growth of oxygen producing plants on the earth.
contracting"Professor				A major premise for Al Gore's contention that
Syun-Ichi-AkasofuDirector of International				dangerous global warming was occurring
Arctic Research Center. Gore published data on				proceeded from core ice samples taken from the
Arctic ice melt. Since the time Gore reported				Artic. They represented hundreds of years by
polar ice shrinkage, the polar caps have recovered				various layers. Entrapped within the ice layers was
the lost ice and then some.				CO2.
4. Two scientists point out flaws about scientists				The flaw was this. While CO2 increases were
embracing global warming. Professor Paul Reiter,				found associated with warming trends, they came
Pasteur Institute, Paris: "The claim of top 1000 or				after the warming trendas much as 800 to
2000 scientists (endorsing global warming) is				2000 years later. The CO2 was a result of the
wrongif you look at the bibliography of them."				warming trend, not the cause of it. CO2 came
Professor Richard Lindzen of M.I.T. says: "to build				after the warming occurred.
up to 2,500, they have to be reviewers and				Indeed as warming of the earth occurs, the sea
government people and so on".				spews out CO2. (95% of greenhouse gases
5. The IPCC (the U.N. International Panel on				come in the form of water vapor from the
Climate Change) like any U.N. body, is politically				oceans anywayaccording to scientists who
driven. The final conclusions are politically driven,				research the subject)
the evidence offered was that "a consensus of				Carl Wunsch, oceanographer professor at M.I.T
scientists agreed that planet earth was warming				and author of 4 major text books on
and it was due to the proliferation of				oceanography explained it: "When you heat the
hydrocarbons." The perpetrators of this false				ocean surface it tends to emit CO2when you
information claimed that over 600 scientists				cool the surface it absorbs CO2."
agreed that the cause was "increased				There were periods in our history when we had
hydrocarbon usage". The scientific facts do not				three times as much CO2 as we do nowor
support this.				periods when we had even ten times as much
A piece of information that refutes the whole				CO2.
notion that there was an international consensus				"The IPCC (International Panel on Climate
of scientists was a survey done by scientist Art				Changes) like any U.N. body is politically driven. The
Robinson of the Oregon Institute of Science and				final conclusions are politically driven." Professor
Medicine. He polled and received responses of				Philip Stott, Dept. of Biogeography, University of
over 22,000 of the scientists. Twenty two				London.
thousand disagreed that the global warming was				Co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, says
caused by increased hydrocarbon usage. The				this: "I don't even like to call it the environmental
more recent tally is over 31,000.				movement anymore cause really it is a political
Scientist Art Robinson, at the request of the				activist movement. (the environmental movement
president, first did a report which was published in				against global warming) has evolved into the
the Wall Street Journal. There was such a				strongest movement there is for preventing
backlash of protest that he then did the survey				development in developing countries."
of more than 22,000 scientists. President Bush				"Climate scientists need there to be a problem in
then refused to sign the Kyoto Accord, much to				order to get funding." Dr. Roy Spencer, Weather
the criticism of other world leaders.				Satellite Team Leader NASA (space program)
The most high profile person who furnished				You may be wondering why there can be a 800
flawed evidence was Al Gore. Unfortunately few				year lag before the increased CO2 shows up. It is
people questioned his reporting, based on the				because of the vast area and enormous depth of
information that he presented. He provided a				the oceans.
movie, "An Inconvenient Truth", that				Here is a summary of the facts and truth that
"demonstrated" that glaciers were melting so fast				refutes the lies and misrepresentations about
that the islanders in the South Pacific were				global warming:
flooded out and had to move to New Zealand.				* Global warming is not occurring because of
Here are the facts. In the last 50 years sea levels				hydrocarbon usage. Solar disturbances (sun
have risen 3 inches. I cannot imagine any sane				storms) clearly are related to the changes in
person building a home that could be flooded out				global temperatures.
by only a 3 inch increase of water levels in a 50				* The earth's temperature has only increased 1
year period.				degree in the last 3,000 years.
It is true that glaciers in many places are melting.				* The recent temperature increase, and the rate
They have been melting for the past 200 years.				of increase, does not correspond to the increase
(Interestingly, they are growing on California's Mt.				of hydrocarbon usage. (since 1940, there was a 6
Shasta) There is no co-relation of increased melt				fold increase of hydrocarbons...yet no related
due to hydrocarbon usage. It started over 200				increase in global warming)
years ago, long before the large increase of				* The number and quality of hurricanes has not
hydrocarbon usage of the past 50 to 100 years.				co- related to the increase in global warming.
Scientist Art Robinson says people were "lied to".				* Glacial melt does not correspond to
There is recorded a 7 inch average annual				hydrocarbon usage.
shrinkage of glaciers in the past 50 years. This				* Reducing hydrocarbon usage would not stop or
rate is not significantly greater than the previous				change global warming.
150 years. In fact, since Gore's report, the				* Reducing hydrocarbon usage could destroy our
Antarctic polar ice cap has more than recovered.				modern society.
Al Gore also claimed that the global warming has				* Carbon dioxide produced by man does not
increased hurricanes...not so according to the U. S.				destroy our earth, it is not shown to cause global
Weather Service records. The records show that				warming.
basically there is no significant increase in the last				* The "consensus of 600 scientists" is a
100 to 150 years. Increases and decreases yes,				fabrication...a lie. This group of 600 was not
but not a significant trend. Once again Art				allowed to comment on the report, nor was
Robinson says, "a flat out lie".				discussion at the Kyoto Accord allowed. Some
What then is the cause of global warming?				scientists only agreed "that more research was
Scientific evidence supports the fact that solar				needed" on the subject.
storms are responsible for the earth's				* Over 22,000 scientists agreed that global
temperature changes. The earth waxes and				warming was not caused by hydrocarbon usage.
wanes in temperature. One thousand years ago				Don't misunderstand me. I am not against a clean
the earth was actually 1 degree warmer than it is				environment but I see no rationale for limiting
now. In George Washington's time it was 1				hydrocarbon usage. What I see as more
degree cooler. The average variation over a 3,000				important is the control of reckless and
year period is 3 degrees. Over a long period of				unnecessary pollution of toxic wastes into the
time there is as much as a 10 degree fluxion in				environment. The U.S. is already addressing this
temperatures. Anyone who studies history knows				problem with stringent regulation in many areas.
there was a very destructive ice age at one time.				Polluters like China should be regulated, not
Actually alarmists and nay-sayers who "champion"				exempted. More can be done, but shutting down
the environment were successful in stopping				U.S. factories and stopping electrical generation will
construction of nuclear facilities (for power				not solve the "perceive global warming problem!
generation) here in the U.S. in the past 30 years.				Update 2008: In Stephen Leeb's Energy World (an
(no new ones developed in 30 years) Japan (the				investment newsletter) he reports this:
only victim of nuclear bombing) now produces				"...man-made warming is a hoax. It is simply the
40% of its power from nuclear plants. France				biggest farce ever foisted upon mankind in the
generates over 70% of their power from nuclear.				name of science."
Source: The Oil & Energy Investment Report.				His newsletter goes on to point out that
(Other reports say 80%. is the figure.) The				worldwide the winter 2007-2008 was one of the
environmentalists predicted an ice age would again				coldest years since records were kept. The
occur due to nuclear proliferation. They have now				National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
flip-flopped and claim that global warming will				(NOAA), reports that the ice cover shrunk from
destroy the earth.				5 million square miles in January 2007 to only 1.5
Worldwide there are now over 320 nuclear power				million square miles by October of 2007. In spite
plants under construction. None are in the U.S.A.				of this, it is now almost back to its original size...all
China alone has dozens under construction and				within a year.
dozens and dozens more on the drawing board				Did reduction of hydrocarbon usage cause this?
for future construction. Demand for crude oil has				No way! According to Dr. Leeb, the 1997 Kyoto
skyrocketed throughout the world, while the				Protocol so incensed scientists at the hijack, in the
supply of new crude is diminishing. Worldwide				name of science, by Gore and "authoritative
recession has depressed the price of oil but the				sources", that they reacted vehemently".

Power Down

The Global Warming Swindle...exposed By Respected Scientists