The Pew Center on Global Climate Change and the Business Environmental Leadership Council

The Pew Center on Global Climate Change wasamounts of energy resources (Balaam 460). Over
established in 1998 as a non-profit, non-partisanthe last hundred years, the countries that are
and independent organization whose mission is tonow industrialized have become so at the cost of
address global warming (Pew). Alongside thethe environment. A key environmental problem is
creation of the Pew Center was the Businessin regards to growth in developing nations and
Environmental Leadership Council (BELC). BELCthere effect on environmental problems. This is a
was created in the belief that businesses mustkey reason why the Bush administration hasn't
develop efficient and effective solutions insigned the Kyoto Protocol; the protocol doesn't
addressing the climate problem. BELC has growncall for an equal proportion of emission reductions
into the largest U.S. based association offor industrialized and developing nations. However,
corporations focused on addressing climatedeveloping nations counter and say that they
change. It currently consists of forty-onewould mean vast amounts of international aid in
members representing $2 trillion in marketorder to economically and industrially prosper and
capitalization and over three million employeescurb emissions at the same time. It is interesting
(BELC). Many sectors are included, such as oil, gas,to note "Many of the newly industrialized countries
transportation, utilities, chemicals, and many more.(NICs), such as China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand,
Many well known companies are part of BELC,and India among other, have also been criticized
including: Boeing, BP, GE, Hewlett-Packardfor their failure to take the environment into
Company, IBM, Intel, Lockheed Martin, Maytag,account (Balaam 460).
Novartis, Toyota, and many other companies withThus, one can see that the Pew Center must
tremendous market influence (BELC). It isaddress the climate issue globally and that BELC is
extremely interesting to note that the Pewneeded in order to actually accomplish the
Center doesn't receive money from thereduction of greenhouse gases. What the Pew
companies of the BELC. Instead, it receives itsCenter has done is put together a group of many
money from The Pew Charitable Trusts ("Pewtop companies that operate in many countries.
Charitable"). The Pew Center and BELC companiesBecause the Pew Center's goal is addressing global
hold four core beliefs. First, they accept the viewsclimate change, having all of these top companies
of most scientists that enough is known aboutpledging to do there part makes the Pew Center
climate change to finally do something about it.more credible and puts them at an advantage
Second, businesses can and should establish andover other environmental groups because it has
meet emission requirements, invest in new, moreties to these forty-one companies that represent
efficient products, practices, and technologies.over $2 trillion in market capitalization. As Alcan
Third, they recognize that The Kyoto Protocol isillustrated, these companies are actually doing their
the first step in the international process. Theypart in curbing emissions while still maintaining
believe that the countries that have joined theeconomic growth.
Protocol must implement the market-basedAfter extensive research, it's fair to say there
mechanisms that are written into the Treaty. Andare no major critics of The Pew Center on Global
lastly, they believe that significant progress can beClimate Change. As a matter of fact, a Pew
made in both addressing climate change andCenter quote was used to debunk a critic of
sustaining economic growth in the United Statesglobal warming in a PBS article. A huge critic of
(BELC). Before getting into the transnationalglobal warming is Petr Chylek, Professor of
controversy that the Pew Center and BELC isPhysics and Atmospheric Science at Dalhousie
engaged in, examining the problem of globalUniversity in Halifx, Nova Scotia. He wrote
warming is needed to understand the context and"Scientists who want to attract attention to
scope of the issue.themselves, who want to attract great funding to
Global Warming is a huge problem threatening thethemselves, have to (find a) way to scare the
very existence of our species on this planet. Inpublic...and this you can achieve only by making
2002, the Pentagon predicted that a suddenthings bigger and more dangerous than they really
change in the Earth's climate could causeare" ("Debating"). The PBS article used this quote
Prolonged droughts in northern Europe and thefrom the Pew Center to debunk Professor
United States [that would] lead to acute food andChylek
water shortages, while typhoons and hurricanesAddressing climate change is no simple task. To
devastate low-lying regions like Bangladesh. Africaprotect ourselves, our economy, and our land
is crippled by disease and famine; southern Europefrom the adverse effects of climate change, we
is flooded with millions of refuges; in the Persianmust ultimately dramatically reduce emissions of
Gulf, Chinese and U.S. naval forces square offcarbon dioxide and other greenhouse
over access to Saudi oil fields. (Goodell 132)gases...shifting away from a century's legacy of
This is what our own government believes willunrestrained fossil fuel use and its associated
happen if the Earth's temperature goes up aemissions in pursuit of more efficient and
couple of degrees! Ross Gelbspan points out thatrenewable sources of energy. Such a
since the start of industrialization in the 19thtransformation will require society to engage in a
century, the human thirst for fossil fuels hasconcerted effort, over the near and long-term, to
gotten to the point where most scientists believeseek out opportunities and design actions to
that global temperatures have risen at least 1reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ("Debating")
degree Fahrenheit over the last century ("Boiling"Most outsiders and environmental groups see the
24-27). In addition, the evidence shows thatPew Center as a step in the right direction. They
carbon dioxide levels have increased from 280also view the BELC as a collection of companies
parts per million (ppm) over the last hundredwho are trying to make a difference. There are
years to about 380ppm today ("Denial" 16a). Thatalways going to be environmentalists so out of
means that within the next hundred years, if wetouch with reality that they believe every single
keep up our pace, carbon dioxide levels will go upindustry or machine that pollutes should be
to a lot more than 480ppm because the amountdestroyed and that every single area that is not
of pollutants and greenhouse gases we are usingused by humans should be reforested and
keeps going up and up. The Pew Center has ainhabited by animals. They don't realize the
policy program that does four main things to tryeconomic catastrophe this would cause: Millions
to help the international and domestic communitywould lose jobs because the companies they
(the United States is responsible for 25% of globalwork for would be closed because they release
greenhouse emissions) clean up it's act. First, itemissions, millions would starve. This isn't worth
produces independent, non-partisan analyses ofcleaner air and more animals flocking about. Never
global warming policy alternatives in the Unitedmind losing jobs, because cars would be illegal,
States and abroad. Second, it educates keyhow would anybody get to work in the first
decision-makers about policy options. Third, itplace? The emphasis is clear. This is the extreme
encourages the domestic and internationalside of the spectrum. The other extreme side is
community to reduce emissions of greenhousepolluting and profiting so much that eventually, the
gases. And lastly, they produce reports, policyplanet would become financial rich but
briefs, working papers and Legislativeuninhabitable. Thus, the Pew Center's approach is
Administrative Proposals (Pew).correct. Addressing the issue while sustaining
The Pew Center is located in Arlington, Virginia. Itseconomic growth is complicated but has proven
measures and activities extend throughout theto be possible.
globe, especially because global warming is anIt seems that The Pew Center on Global Climate
issue affecting every nation. How can the worldChange is a very reputable and positive
trust the Pew Center and BELC when the BELCorganization that is using its resources to address
companies are comprised of so many companiesglobal warming. The research has shown that
historically known to be huge polluters? Thisdifferent sources all agree that both global
seems like a conflict of interest domestically. Thewarming is a huge threat and that the Pew
United States hasn't signed the Kyoto Protocol,Center is positively addressing it. The Pew Center
and the Pew Center admits "The Kyoto Protocolreceives its funding from The Pew Charitable
is the first step in the international process" (Pew).Trusts. The Trusts will invest $204 million in fiscal
When the President of the Pew Center on Globalyear 2006 to provide organizations and citizens
Climate Change, Eileen Clauseen, was asked whywith fact-based research and practical solutions
the U.S., the largest producer of carbon dioxide,for challenging issues ("Pew Charitable").
has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol, her responseA great deal of evidence shows that the BELC
was, "...no, it has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol.are actually making a difference and curbing their
President Bush has also made it clear that the U.S.emissions. Some companies are even exceeding
will not ratify the Protocol..." Clauseen goes on toKyoto goals. Because the BELC companies openly
say thatadmit that enough is known about global warming
Most countries were waiting for the outcome ofto address it, they actively participate in emission
the November meeting in The Hague beforecurbing activities. For example, BELC member BP
moving forward with ratification. They are nowAmoco "plans to bring its own carbon emissions
awaiting decisions that might be made in Bonn. Butto 10 percent below its 1990 level by 2010,
whether enough countries ratify it for it to enterexceeding the Kyoto goal of roughly 5 percent
into force is an open question. The EU hasfor industrial countries. ("Social"). Dupont, another
indicated that it will ratify, and other may as well.BELC member, has already cut its 1990
It will take 55 countries representing 55 percentgreenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent. They
of developed country emissions for the treaty toplan to reduce them by 65 percent by 2010. This
enter into force" ("Global").also proves that meeting the Kyoto goal is not
Clauseen has acknowledged that it will take aonly possible, but also surpassing it is as well
substantial effort to reduce the current carbon("Social"). Other BELC companies, such as Toyota
dioxide levels in the air. It's a complicated andand Boeing are advancing company-wide
controversial issue. On one hand, you haveprograms for reducing carbon emission. Toyota
developed countries reducing their emissions andwas the first automaker to mass-produce a
finding energy alternatives. We even have thehybrid car, the Prius ("Social"). Some BELC
United States acknowledging the threat of globalcompanies are also looking for alternative energy
warming. However, a huge problem lies withinsources. BP Amoco and Dutch Shell have been
developing countries. These countries, located ininvesting heavily in new sources of energy. "BP
regions such as South American and Asia, will addAmoco is now a leading manufacturer of solar
to the carbon dioxide level as they economicallycells. Shell, already a major player in both wind and
improve and as the standard of living for itssolar cells, is also investing heavily in hydrogen and
people increases (Balaam 463). But this increasewill likely open the world's first chain of hydrogen
comes at a cost. We may see a "second wave"stations in Iceland" ("Social").
of industrialization sweep the developing world andWith the evidence presented, it's quite evident
create more climate problems. Or, thethat a coalition of top companies, contrary to
industrialized nations must help developingwhat one might think, are actually addressing the
countries economically expand without destroyingglobal climate issue. The deeper political economic
the world. However, creating "green and clean"issues behind all of this include political pressure
infrastructure in developing nations becomes afrom companies (non-BELC) that lobby hard for
huge monetary issue.lax industrial regulations, environmental groups that
The Pew Center on Global Climate Change andlobby the opposite, the need to address this issue
the BELC are engaged in a transnationalwith every single country in the world, the need
controversy that extends all over the globe andto unite with every country to fight this battle,
includes extremely poor third world countries asand lastly, addressing the climate issue while still
well as very rich countries. They are ultimatelygrowing economically. There are many actors
trying to reduce and eliminate global warming.involved from many different perspectives. From
Global warming affects all nations, and all nationsthe industrial side, business leaders are trying to
have contributed to the problem. Thus, the keylobby for regulations that help them. From the
question is whether or not you can trust the Pewenvironmental side, organizations like the Pew
Center, and especially the BELC, in finding aCenter are main actors because they are
solution. There are many actors involved in thisindependent, non-partisan, and in this case,
initiative. Because the United States only containsencompass many top companies that have been
4% of the world's population yet emits 25%proven to take measures into their own hands
("Global"), it's a huge actor because this problem isand address the global climate issue. There are
of global proportions. The leaders of many topother actors as well, such as researchers who are
businesses are also key actors because theirtrying to find that next big energy alternative, and
companies are partly responsible for theeach individual, who is ultimately affected by
environmental problems we face. Herein lies adecisions that are made by the upper levels,
conflict of interest and an open door for criticism.because environmental policy and economic issues
Many of these top businesses are a part of thego hand in hand. In answering cui bono, one must
BELC. Most of these companies are huge pollutersfirst realize that The Pew Center on Global
and are, according to the Pew Center and BELC,Climate Change isn't looking to make a profit; The
trying to cut down on their emissions and comePew Charitable Trusts contains billions of dollars.
up with new alternative energy sources. HowThe BELC represents over $2 trillion in market
sincere are these companies in actually addressingcapitalization and 3 million workers, so profit isn't a
global warming? Are they willing to accept thebig deal to them. The environment benefits. The
financial losses associated with being 'green' andpeople who live on this planet benefit. When
'clean'? Other actors include all the heads ofaddressing Global Warming and than asking cui
nations, NGOs, environmental and green groups,bono, the answer is "Everybody."
and even every single individual who makes anThere are many interesting things I discovered as
effort to reduce pollution.I researched the Pew Center and BELC. At first, I
In examining the international political economy ofthought that a center that is comprised of so
the global environment, there are four aspects ofmany companies that have historically been
environmental problems in general: "...thepolluters made me think that they are in this for
environment as a communal good, the increasinglysome kind of profit or publicity. However, as I
global scope of environmental problems, thedove into the information, I began to discover
proliferation of actors involved in these issues, andsome interesting things. The Pew Center is funded
the multidimensional makeup and linkage betweenby The Pew Charitable Trusts, thus BELC
the immediate causes and effects ofcompanies don't contribute at all to the Pew
environmental issues" (453). A very positiveCenter. The Pew Center and BELC have formed
example was when Alcan joined BELC on Octobera mutually advantageous relationship not centered
18. "Alcan is a multinational, market-drive companyon money. My research has showed that both
and a global leader in aluminum andThe Pew Center and BELC companies heavily
packaging...aerospace applications, bauxite miningaddress the climate issue. This issue is very
and alumina processing" (Michaud). Alcan has hadcontroversial to begin with. Even though all
great success in reducing its greenhouse gases. Itscientists believe global warming is occurring, not
has proven that it's possible to address globalall agree that it's a big threat. Some believe there
climate change while maintaining competitiveis no need to curb economic growth to address
excellence, growth, and profitability.this issue. However, the Pew Center and BELC
The reason Alcan is such a positive example isrealize that the evidence shows there really is a
becausethreat. Globally, it's a very complicated situation.
The principal vehicle for this effort is Alcan's GHGPoor nations don't have the means to help global
emissions reduction program, TARGET, whichwarming, and this is why a system needs to be
was implemented in 2001 and is a key componentsetup where the international community helps
of the Company's Environment, Health and Safetythese poor nations economically advance without
(EHS FIRST) management system. In TARGET'sdestroying the environment. Industrialized nations
first four years, Alcan's cumulative GHG reductionmust unite together to use their resources to
objective was set at 575,000 tonnes of CO2e. Byrescue the planet from the condition The Age of
the end of 2004, Alcan far surpassed this byOil put us in. At first look, when you see an
recording a reduction of 2.9 million tones of CO2eorganization partnered up with very big
(Michaud)companies, you would believe that it is not a good
This one company, a member of BELC, set itsthing for the environment. But if you look at all
own policy and reduced its emissions 2 millionthey have done over the years, you can clearly
tones more than its original goal! It is definitelysee the BELC companies regularly exceed Kyoto
interesting to note that according to Anik Michaud,goals and that the Pew Center regularly pushes
the Pew Charitable Trusts, one of the Unitedfor greenhouse gas emissions and even gives
States' largest philanthropies, established the Pewproposals to the United States government that
Center. It has an influential voice in improving thefights this issue.
environment and is dedicated to providing credibleWorks Cited
information and innovative solutions to addressBalaam, David N., and Michael Veseth. Introduction
global climate change. Maybe the Pew Center isto International Political Economy.
sincere in its efforts to help global warming, seeingBELC. 12 Dec. 2005. Pew Center. 13 Dec. 2005
how it was actually setup by a charity. It's"Debating 'Global Warming'." 22 Apr. 2005. PBS 13
important to understand some of the IPEDec. 2005
problems regarding global climate change beforeGelbspan, Ross. "Our denial is at Category 5." USA
examining what the Pew Center has done aboutToday 26 Sept. 2005.
it.Gelbspan, Ross. "Boiling Point." Nation 8 Aug. 2005.
The environment has been severely abused as aCenter. 23 Dec. 2005
result of economic growth, industrialization, trade,Goodell, Jeff. "WAS IT GLOBAL WARMING?"
and investment policies of the developed nations.Rolling Stone Dec. 2005.
As more international trade and investmentMichaud, Anik. "Alcan Joins [BELC] to address
occurs, more industrially manufactured productsglobal climate change." CNW Group. 18 Oct.
and services are produced that require vast