Turning Global Warming to Your Advantage

Under the former Greenpeace co-founder'srises to $100 per lb (a further 150 percent
scenario, Bambrough extrapolated the Worldincrease), the cost of nuclear power would only
Nuclear Association (WNA) projections for 2030.rise by approximately 6.75 percent." Fuel costs for
Nuclear power demand is then expected to soarcoal and gas are 35 and 73 percent, respectively.
from the current 368 Gw, produced by theAnd they release massive doses of CO2 into the
world's 441 nuclear reactors. He computed, usingair.
Moore's premise of a 60-percent nuclear-reliance,What else can be done aside from a worldwide,
that nuclear reactors would produce 18,900 Twhunanimous endorsement of nuclear energy? There
of the total power demand in 2030, which themay still be difficulties ahead. Lovelock told us the
WNA estimates might reach 31,500 Twh. ToCO2 emissions problem should have been
produce that much electricity, Bambroughaddressed 50 years ago. It takes between 50 and
calculated that by 2030, nearly 2700 nuclear100 years for the atmosphere to cycle through
reactors will be required across the planet.those emissions.
Envisioning the "potential" of a 600-percentThe Sprott report co-authors concluded there will
increase in nuclear reactors online, about 25 yearsbe supply problems for food, water and energy.
from now, Bambrough also calculated how muchThey envision problems with national security,
uranium would be required to fuel those reactors.soaring grain prices, and greater investments
According to Bambrough, current global uraniumneeded to provide water and energy to those
mining production rests at about the 100who aren't buried ten feet deep in their
million-pound level. By 2030, if nuclear energyindebtedness. They foresee a currency collapse
expands as Moore insists it should, then theas central banks flood the money system to
world's utilities will require on the order of aboutprovide liquidity. And, of course, gold will resume
1.3 billion pounds every year. With regards to athe role it has always held during times of
planetary build-up of nuclear energy, Bambroughoverpowering economic calamity.
wrote, "The supply of uranium may well be theIs this too much reality for you? Should we just
most limiting factor."wait a while and see what transpires? We might
This may become the new case for a sustainednot be so lucky. Some experts, such as the Chief
rally in the spot uranium price. Bambrough wrote,Claims Strategist for Swiss Re, wrote in a March
"Much higher uranium prices will be required to2006 CERES report, "Global warming has
attract enough investment capital to meet theaccelerated from a problem that might affect our
growth in demand." This has already begun, asgrandchildren, to one that could significantly disturb
uranium prices have skyrocketed for the past sixthe social and economic conditions of our lifetime."
years. Long-term uranium recently traded as highIn other words, Messrs. Sprott and Bambrough
as $46/pound, exponentially higher than the spotare correct in their assumptions and conclusions.
price of $6.40/pound in late 2000. Bambrough isThe time to get moving is today, not thirty years
correct in his conclusion. Building an undergroundfrom now.
uranium mine costs far more than it did in theFor a second opinion, before completing this
glory days of uranium in the 1950s. Environmentalcolumn, we forwarded the Sprott report to David
regulations force miners to spend more and takeMiller. He wears many hats, including a consultancy
longer in constructing any uranium-producingto the International Atomic Energy Agency,
facility, including an ISL operation.third-term Wyoming legislator, president of
"Marginal mines will become price setters," wroteStrathmore Minerals (TSX: STM) and a walking
Bambrough. This helps explain why the Sprottencyclopedia on uranium, geology, nuclear power
Asset Management funds have invested heavily inand politics. He responded quite bluntly, "The fuel
companies such as Strathmore Minerals (TSX:of the 19th century was coal. The fuel of the
STM; Other OTC: STHJF), Energy Metals (TSX:20th century was oil. Both have run their
EMC) and others. When we first interviewedeconomic course. Uranium is on its way to
Strathmore Minerals Chief Executive, Devbecoming the energy fuel of the 21st century.
Randhawa, in June 2004, he told us his strategyThe crescendo of countries clamoring for nuclear
was to capitalize upon a sustained rally in theenergy has been growing louder in each year of
uranium price by acquiring properties which werethis new millennium." Perhaps, we may yet see
uneconomic at the sub-$20/level. His strategy hasMoore's energy mix come to pass, or at least
rewarded shareholders and continued to do sodramatic growth in the nuclear sector to more
with each uptick in the spot uranium price. Ifclosely approach his targeted percentage level.
Bambrough's conclusion is accurate, the juniorOne key question remains unanswered, during our
uranium developers could very well become thetwo-year investigation into uranium and nuclear
Internet high-fliers. That conclusion was reachedenergy. Sure, we've gotten a lot of answers, but
by newsletter writer James Dines, this pastwe remain unconvinced. No one has satisfactorily
November, and repeated numerous times inanswered this question: "Will there be sufficient
multiple reports by others.supplies of 'already mined uranium' and current
"Large low-cost producers may be able to reapmining production available to the world's nuclear
Middle East-like oil profits for decades," wrotereactors to meet the anticipated global demand
Bambrough. If the spread between productionfor electricity?" The make-break word in the
costs and spot uranium keeps widening, theabove question is "available." Uranium is nearly
smaller uranium companies are going to hit it big.everywhere. There are about 1.7 billion pounds of
Those companies, which postponed uranium'already mined uranium' in the world's inventories.
mining, will be selling their uranium production atBut will there be enough uranium made available
the kind of profits-to-production spreadto the utilities when the time comes?
ExxonMobil or ChevronTexaco now enjoy.If there is not, today's spot uranium price could
Rising uranium prices are probably more of anlook comparable to gasoline prices, circa 1965, at
irritation for fuel traders than the utilities, whosome future point.
worry about construction costs. The actual fuelGo to the Lung Pain website for information on
cost to operate a nuclear power plant borders onpain in the lungs. Visit the Meaning Of Roses
the absurd. Bambrough wrote in his report, "Fuelwebsite for info on symbolism of roses. Want to
costs (for nuclear) are merely 4.5 percent of totallearn everything on good lab values? Visit the
costs, even with uranium at $40 per lb. If uraniumNormal Lab Values website.