| mer motor worker for Fords Motor Company Ltd | | | | condition. Again, the effects have always been |
| has received £8,500 in compensation after | | | | known, but it took legislation for employers to |
| his hands were left permanently damaged from | | | | take their responsibilities towards their workforce |
| using vibrating tools at work. The man worked as | | | | more seriously rather than just treating VWF as |
| a toolmaker for over 30 years for the company | | | | an ‘occupational hazard’. The |
| and as a result of continued use of power tools | | | | victim in this claim was still working in an |
| developed the condition known as Hand Arm | | | | environment where the condition was perhaps |
| Vibration Syndrome (HAVS). This condition, also | | | | known about, but not officially recognised as a |
| known as Vibration White Finger, is classed as an | | | | work-place injury. Today, things are very |
| industrial injury that affects people operating | | | | different and repeated campaigns by the Health |
| hand-held vibrating power tools over a prolonged | | | | and Safety Executive highlighting the effects of |
| period such as power drills, chainsaws and | | | | VWF have made employers far more aware of |
| pneumatic drills. The injury leads to nerve | | | | their responsibilities to both inform and protect |
| damage, resulting in poor circulation that | | | | their workforce against the effects of the |
| compounds the damage to small nerves and blood | | | | condition. An increase in the number of Vibration |
| vessels in the extremities and can eventually lead | | | | White Finger Claims has also seen an increase in |
| to loss of function. | | | | safety. |
| Under the Control of Vibration at Work | | | | Although not a life-threatening condition, HAVS is |
| Regulations 2005, employers are required to | | | | now classed as an industrial injury and those |
| make a suitable and sufficient assessment of the | | | | suffering from its effects do have the right to |
| risk to health and safety to their employees | | | | claim compensation if they feel that they have |
| arising from the prolonged use of power tools. | | | | been unnecessarily exposed to the dangers of |
| One in ten people who regularly use power tools | | | | prolonged use of tools that can cause the |
| are at risk of developing the condition. The man, | | | | condition. It is a preventable condition, although in |
| who retired nine years ago from the company, | | | | an engineering or heavy industry environment, |
| said that he had never been told of the potential | | | | there will always be risks. It is up to the |
| dangers by his employers. However, up until the | | | | employers to take their duty of care towards |
| introduction of the Regulations in 2005, employers | | | | their employees seriously and to do everything |
| took a rather lax attitude to the condition, seeing | | | | that they can to reduce the risks involved, |
| it as ‘just one of those hazards’ | | | | particularly when using heavy machinery. The |
| that all workers could be vulnerable to. The | | | | classification of VWF and HAVS as an industrial |
| implementation of the Regulations brought | | | | injury is an important step in enforcing that duty |
| much-needed attention to the condition, which can | | | | of care responsibility in any environment and |
| have a lifelong effect on those suffering from | | | | highlighting the situation through compensation |
| HAVS. | | | | claims not only ensures that those who have |
| Since the Regulations were brought into effect, | | | | been effected receive the compensation they |
| far more research has been carried out into the | | | | deserve, but will also prevent others from |
| effects of Vibration White Finger and HAVS and it | | | | suffering the same fate in future. |
| has been recognised as a serious and debilitating | | | | |