Understanding The Complexity Of Global Warming Issue

Environmentalists are those people who arewithdrawn from the Treaty. Since it has not been
dedicated to the preservation, restoration, orratified by the US to this point, the US is not
improvement of the natural environment, and thisrequired to follow the provisions of the Kyoto
includes the preservation of our natural resourcesTreaty.
and the prevention of pollution. In regards to theOn July 25, 1997, the U.S. Senate passed the
global warming topic, environmentalists believeByrd-Hagel Resolution, which called for developing
that forests should not be cut down or burned,nations to also be required to follow the Kyoto
which would help to prevent more CO2 fromTreaty before forcing industrialized nations to sign
going into the air. Environmentalists also supportoff on it, 95-0. They feared serious harm would
renewable energy sources, as less coal and fossilcome to the US economy if they signed off on it
fuel usage would lead to less CO2 being put intobeforehand, as developing nations not bound by
the air.the Kyoto Treaty would have an unfair
Media coverage in the United States tends to giveadvantage over industrialized nations like the US in
equal coverage to both sides of the debatecoal and fossil fuel production. As a result, the
involving global warming. That may soundTreaty was never submitted to the Senate for
reasonable, but it actually might lead to inaccurateratification.
coverage. The reason why is because theCurrent President George W. Bush has no
"balance" of covering both sides of the issue hasintentions of submitting the treaty to the Senate
allowed a small group of global warming sceptics,for ratification, not because he doesn't support
many of which are funded by carbon-basedthe Kyoto principles, but because of the
industry interests, to be frequently consulted andexemption granted to China (the world's
quoted in new reports on climate change.second-largest emitter of carbon dioxide after the
This has allowed their views to be greatlyUS, and is projected to be the largest emitter by
amplified to the point where it looks like there is a2010.) Bush also believes the Treaty would put
50/50 divide on whether human-made globalmuch strain on the US economy; he has concerns
warming is a legitimate concern or not, when inover the uncertainties which are present in the
reality, there is more overwhelming evidence thatclimate change issue.
suggests that human-made global warming is aBush and the US Government have enacted
real legitimate concern. Controversy is beingsome of their own legislation in order to mitigate
stirred when science actually finds consensus.the climate change and the US is on track to fulfil
However, there is disagreement about whetherits pledge to reduce its carbon intensity 18% by
the scientific community has reached a consensus2012. However, Paul Krugman has stated that the
that human-made global warming is a legitimatetarget 18% reduction in carbon intensity is still
concern and that if it is left unchecked, it willactually an increase in overall emissions. In addition,
cause considerable damage to our planet in termsthe White House has also come under criticism
of extreme climate changes, more powerfulfor downplaying reports linking human activity and
tropical storms and hurricanes, and rising seagreenhouse gas emissions to climate change.
levels that will lead to the destruction of coastalAl Gore has brought renewed focus on the topic
communities, among other destructive events.of global warming with his Oscar-winning
Opponents maintain that no consensus has beendocumentary, "An Inconvenient Truth." This
reached, claiming that most scientists believe thatdocumentary shows Mr. Gore's passionate and
human-made global warming is "unproven," theyinspirational look at his fervent crusade to stop
dismiss the theory altogether, or they dispute theglobal warming's deadly progress by exposing the
dangers of consensus science.myths and misconceptions that surround it. The
Global warming is also a decisive political issue,documentary also reveals that if most of the
especially in the United States. Most Republicansworld's scientists are right about global warming,
tend to adopt the view of not believing thatwe may have just ten years to avert a major
human-made global warming is a "proven" issue,catastrophe that could cause our world to
so they oppose all proposed measures ofexperience extreme weather, floods, droughts,
counteracting it because they don't believe it'sepidemics, and killer heat waves at levels we've
necessary. Democrats, on the other hand, believenever seen before.
that human-made global warming is a legitimateAs you can see, there are many facets and
cause of concern and endorse measures toelements that go into the topic of global warming.
reduce and/or eliminate the threat.From the controversial science behind it to the
Two perfect examples of the political divisionway the media covers it to the politics that are
involving the global warming issue are Presidentbehind each side of the debate to the Kyoto
George W. Bush's inaction regarding the KyotoTreaty that tries to address the issue of global
Treaty provisions and 2000 Democraticwarming to the Oscar-winning documentary, "An
Presidential candidate Al Gore's new documentary,Inconvenient Truth," that tries to alert people that
"An Inconvenient Truth," that refocuses attentionglobal warming is a real issue that needs to be
on the global warming issue and why we mustaddressed now by all, both governmental and
address it soon or face dire consequences.individual, global warming is a very important topic
The Kyoto Treaty is an amendment to thein our world. The debate will likely continue, but
international treaty on climate change, calling forthe evidence seems to indicate that human-made
mandatory emission limitations for the reductionglobal warming is having more pronounced effects
of greenhouse gas emissions to the nations thaton our world, and without concise and decisive
sign off on it. It was opened for signature onaction in the near future, it's quite possible that
December 11, 1997, but wasn't enforced untilthe damage caused by global warming will only
February 16, 2005.continue to become more devastating to our
Even though the United States is a signee of theworld.
Kyoto Treaty, the US has neither ratified nor