Toxic Gas Lawsuits Against Environmental Protection Agency

Within the past couple years, several states andAct and they have a responsibility to regulate it
organizations have filed toxic gas lawsuits againstvia cleaner burning cars.
the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).The Bush Administration and the EPA tried to
The central argument centers on theargue that carbon emissions were beyond the
interpretation of the 1970 Clean Air Act, how tocontrol of the EPA as outlined in the Clean Air Act.
define and regulate "air pollutants", and if it is theThe section of the Clean Air Act under debate
responsibility of the EPA to do so.was the wording that it is the responsibility of the
The first of these lawsuits was filed back in 2005EPA administrator to set emission standards for
in the D.C District Court of Appeals by groups"any air pollutant" from motor vehicles which in his
such as the Sierra Club and the Environmentalher judgment contributes to air pollution and
Integrity Project. The toxic gases under questionaffects public health/welfare.
in this lawsuit were the harmful pollutants emittedThe Administrations approach for emissions was
from concentrated animal feeding operationsthe same as with the concentrated animal feeding
which include ammonia gas, hydrogen sulfide, andoperations: do nothing and let the major auto
fine dust particles. The plaintiffs argue that thesecompanies work amongst themselves to find a
feeding operations are not like traditional familysolution to the carbon dioxide problem. The EPA
farms of the past, but are instead very largeadministrator also debated whether man made
corporate run operations which pack largecarbon dioxide emissions was the real cause of
numbers of animals into very small spaces.global warming, despite existing scientific evidence
The result is the emission of these toxic gases inwhich already supports this theory. This lawsuit
large quantities into the environment on a yearlywas debated by lower courts trying to decide if
basis which have all been linked to causingthe plaintiffs had legal standing, and although the
respiratory illness. In its defense, the EPA claimsDistrict of Columbia Circuit Court ruled in favor of
that it is working with the Bush Administration asthe EPA the case was eventually brought before
part of the sweetheart deal to monitor thethe Supreme Court. According to the Supreme
progress of these concentrated animal feedingCourt ruling it was decided that the plaintiffs had a
operations to clean up their acts on their ownvalid case, and that under the Clean Air Act
over a number of years.carbon dioxide was an air pollutant of public health
This wait and see approach is what led to theconcern.
next set of toxic gas lawsuits filed against theThe EPA is now obligated to begin limiting tailpipe
EPA, although this time the issue was emissionsemissions beginning with the 2009 model year.
gas and global warming. This most recent lawsuitPart of this process will be reducing the escape of
was filed towards the end of 2006 and namestoxic gases from fuel cans by creating a tighter
California, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Illinois,seal on the lids. Automakers will also be restricted
Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut,to the amount of benzene added to gasoline to
New Jersey, New York, Washington, Vermont,ensure proper engine combustion. Benzene is a
and Oregon, as well as Baltimore, the District ofcarcinogen linked to anemia and reduced blood cell
Columbia, and the Sierra Club as plaintiffs.counts, and the new measures taking place by
The argument is whether or not carbon dioxide is2011 ensure that automakers are taking positive
considered an air pollutant leading to globalsteps to make their vehicles more
warming, and if the EPA should be doing more toenvironmentally friendly.
regulate carbon dioxide emissions. The plaintiff'sIt is expected to take until 2030 for full
case is that carbon dioxide must be considered ancompliance on the new measures to take effect,
air pollutant since it has been scientifically provenbut the EPA feels that these stricter standards
to be the principal greenhouse gas affecting globalwill lead to billions of dollars in health care savings
warming. They feel that this definition of carbonand reduced toxic gas emissions by over 300,000
dioxide as a threat to public safety puts it withintons.
the jurisdiction of the EPA under the Clean Air